AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Rationale: Pre-operative lobar function is estimated by scintigraphy in patients with pulmonary malignancies and compromised function. This study compared the lobar perfusion determined by scintigraphy (PS) with data from SPECT/low-dose-CT (SPECT/ldCT) analyzed manually and semi-automatic.

Methods: Retrospective analysis on 39 patients (m/f = 25/14; age: 72.5 [22-89] years) with indication for pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy. Imaging was performed using SPECT/ldCT. Data was analyzed manually and by semi-automatic software. Readers' confidence in 3D-segmentation was scored by two independent readers. Interrater agreement was calculated. In addition, Spearman's rank correlation and Wilcoxon's test were used.

Results: Results from PS differed significantly from SPECT/ldCT processed manually or semi-automatically in 4/5 lobes (total difference ≤21.6%; rho ≥0.44) and in 3/5 (total difference 21.6%; rho ≥0.37), respectively. Readers' confidence in 3D-segmentation showed a perfect interrater agreement (κ = 0.98).

Conclusion: Quantification of lobar perfusion by SPECT/ldCT differs significantly from planar scintigraphy (e.g., with potential influence on therapy). The semi-automatic software analysis provides an applicable methodology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.02.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lobar perfusion
8
analyzed manually
8
semi-automatic software
8
readers' confidence
8
confidence 3d-segmentation
8
interrater agreement
8
total difference
8
pre-operative quantification
4
quantification pulmonary
4
pulmonary function
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!