Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: We undertook the current study on cervical Human Papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence along with cytology in women visiting the Gynecology Out-patient Department of a hospital for common gynecological ailments, subsequent to our earlier population-based study on HPV prevalence from India.
Methods: We analyzed data on cervical-cytology (Pap smears) and PCR-based molecular detection of HPV infection along with socio-demographic variables (N = 696).
Results: We identified 36.84% HPV-positive women amongst whom, HPV16 and 18 together predominated (79.37%) over other HPV types (20.63%). Contrarily, only 6.4% women revealed abnormal cytological lesions, of which, 46.51% were HPV-positive and 95% of such women harbored HPV16/18, while 5% harbored other HPV types. Individuals with normal cytology portrayed 36.09% HPV infections, of which, 77.97% were HPV16/18-positive and 22.03% harbored other HPV types. Overall HPV prevalence decreased significantly (p = 0.047) with increase in age, but HPV16/18 infections were significantly over-represented compared to the other HPV types across all age-groups. Specifically, HPV16 prevalence increased (p < 0.01) with increase in severity of cervical lesions. HPV16 prevalence did not differ between the Hindus and Muslims but HPV18 was significantly higher among the cytologically normal Muslim women (24.14%, p = 0.02), compared to the Hindus (11.91%), specifically among those ≥ 30 years of age. There was a significant (p < 0.05) overrepresentation of HPV16 prevalence among women who were users of oral contraceptive-pills, irrespective of cytology.
Conclusions: Our study highlights the need for HPV16/18-based screening of cervical cancers in India considering the immense socio-cultural and genetic diversity at the population level.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.03.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!