Introduction: Patients on dialysis have important changes in body composition.

Objectives: To determine the correlation between skinfold thickness (SKF) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA) for estimating fat mass (FM) and lean body mass (LBM) in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Methods: Cross-sectional study. We included 50 patients under dialysis treatment. To measure SKF, we used the Lange® skinfold caliper (Beta Technology, California, USA) and we carried out the impedance analysis with the Bodystat Quadscan 4000® (Quadscan, Isle of Man, UK). The measurements were performed post-hemodialysis. The PD patients were measured with and without peritoneal dialysate and body weight was corrected for peritoneal fluid. We determined the Pearson's correlation coefficient between SKF and BIA for estimating FM and LBM. We also evaluated the influence of age, sex, diuretic use, dialysis vintage, extracellular water (ECW), and intracellular water (ICW) through a multivariate regression analysis.

Results: Of the 50-patient total, 29 were men (58%) and patient mean age was 46.3 ± 16.5 years. The correlation between SKF and BIA was r = 0.784 (p < 0.001) for FM and r = 0.925 (p < 0.001) for LBM. Age and sex influenced the variability of FM, whereas sex, age, and ECW influenced the variability of LBM, both evaluated through the SKF and BIA methods.

Conclusion: SKF and BIA are useful methods in clinical practice. The strong and statistically significant correlations between the two methods show they are interchangeable. Age, sex, ECW, and ICW influence the variability of FM and LBM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.1284DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skf bia
16
patients dialysis
12
age sex
12
correlation skinfold
8
skinfold thickness
8
impedance analysis
8
bia estimating
8
lbm evaluated
8
influenced variability
8
variability lbm
8

Similar Publications

Jagim, AR, Horswill, CA, Dobbs, WC, Twohey, EE, Tinsley, GM, Fields, JB, and Jones, MT. Minimum wrestling weight for high school girls wrestling: Time to revisit minimal body fat percent. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to determine whether an alternative body fat percentage (BF%) could be established as a safer margin for minimal wrestling weight (MWW) determination by evaluating the distribution of BF% and MWW values naturally occurring for high school girls wrestling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of skinfold equations and alternative methods for the determination of fat-free mass in young athletes.

Front Sports Act Living

August 2023

Patriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States.

Intoduction: To cross-validate skinfold (SKF) equations, impedance devices, and air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) for the determination of fat-free mass (FFM).

Methods: Male and female youth athletes were evaluated ( = 91[mean ± SD] age: 18.19 ± 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Differences in Body Composition Analysis by DEXA, Skinfold and BIA Methods in Young Football Players.

Children (Basel)

October 2022

Faculty of Sports Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Tajo Street, s/n, 28670 Madrid, Spain.

The most widely used method in professional sports for fat percentage assessment is the skinfold method. However, there is the chance of bias and human error. For this reason, other more precise methods are used, such as single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the present study was to examine (a) the relationship of body fat (BF) assessed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and skinfold thickness (SKF) and (b) the variation of BF by age depending on the assessment method. Participants were 32 women and 134 men recreational marathon runners, who were tested for BF using both assessment methods (BIA and SKF). Rc between BIA and SKF assessment methods was 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess and compare the ability of body fat percentage (BF%) estimated by 2 methods, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and by the Slaughter et al equations for triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness (SKF), in identifying unfavorable levels of several biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk.

Methods: Cross-sectional school-based study with 529 apparently healthy adolescents (267 girls), aged 14.3 ± 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!