A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of the Monitor Unit Objective tool for VMAT in the Eclipse treatment planning system. | LitMetric

Assessment of the Monitor Unit Objective tool for VMAT in the Eclipse treatment planning system.

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother

Servei de Física i Protecció Radiològica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.

Published: February 2018

Aim: This work aims to achieve the highest possible monitor units (MU) reduction using the tool included in the Eclipse treatment planning system, while preserving the plan quality.

Background: The treatment planning system Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) includes a control mechanism for the number of monitor units of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans, named the MU Objective tool.

Material And Methods: Forty prostate plans, 20 gynecological plans and 20 head and neck plans designed with VMAT were retrospectively studied. Each plan () was optimized without using the MU Objective tool, and it was re-optimized with different values of the Maximum MU () parameter of the MU Objective tool. MU differences were analyzed with a paired samples -test and changes in plan quality were assessed with a set of parameters for OARs and PTVs.

Results: The average relative MU difference [Formula: see text] considering all treatment sites, was the highest when  = 400 (-4.2%,  < 0.001). For prostate plans, the lowest [Formula: see text] was obtained (-3.7%,  < 0.001). For head and neck plans [Formula: see text] was -7.3% ( < 0.001) and for gynecological plans [Formula: see text] was 7.0% ( = 0.002). Although similar MU reductions were observed for both sites, for some gynecological plans maximum differences were greater than 10%. All the assessed parameters for PTVs and OARs sparing showed average differences below 2%.

Conclusion: For the three studied clinical sites, establishing  = 400 led to the optimum MU reduction, maintaining the original dose distribution and dosimetric parameters practically unaltered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856680PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

objective tool
12
treatment planning
12
planning system
12
eclipse treatment
8
monitor units
8
assessment monitor
4
monitor unit
4
objective
4
unit objective
4
tool
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!