Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography With Transesophageal Echocardiography for Identifying Vegetation and Intracardiac Complications in Patients With Infective Endocarditis in the Era of 3-Dimensional Images.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging

From the Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital (I.-C.K., G.-R.H., J.-W.H., C.Y.S.), Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital (S.H.L., S.L., B.-C.C.), and Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital (S.C., Y.J.K.), Yonsei University College of Medicine; and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University (I.-C.K.).

Published: March 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study compared cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for diagnosing conditions related to infective endocarditis (IE) in 75 patients, focusing on detecting vegetation and complications.
  • TEE was found to be more effective in identifying small vegetation and conditions like valve perforation and intracardiac fistula, while CT excelled in spotting larger vegetation and perivalvular abscesses.
  • Both imaging methods showed fair diagnostic performance for IE-related complications, with TEE demonstrating better overall results, especially in detecting small vegetation and certain complications.

Article Abstract

Background: Recent evolution of cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides useful information about valvular and perivalvular structures. We compared the diagnostic performance of CT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with applications of 3-dimensional reconstruction in detecting vegetation and intracardiac complications in patients with infective endocarditis (IE).

Methods And Results: Seventy-five patients (53 men; age, 58±15 years) with definite IE who underwent TEE and CT with 3-dimensional reconstruction within 3 days were analyzed. The diagnostic performances of the 2 modalities for vegetation and IE-related intracardiac complications (valve perforation, valve aneurysm, perivalvular abscess, pseudoaneurysm, fistula, and prosthetic valve dehiscence) were compared. The detection rate of vegetation in TEE and CT was 97.3% and 72.0%, respectively. The maximum sizes of vegetation identified by TEE and CT were well correlated (=0.593; <0.001), especially in patients with large vegetation (≥10 mm), suggestive of a high risk of systemic embolism (=0.608; <0.001). However, small vegetation (<10 mm) was underdiagnosed by CT (52.8%) compared with TEE (94.4%), and the sizes of the 2 modalities were poorly correlated (=0.187; =0.445). Both modalities showed fair diagnostic performance for detecting IE-related intracardiac complications with excellent agreement. TEE was more useful for diagnosing valve perforation and intracardiac fistula, whereas CT was better for diagnosing perivalvular abscess.

Conclusions: Cardiac CT shows a comparable diagnostic performance with TEE for large vegetation and several IE-related complications. TEE is better for detecting small vegetation, valve perforation, and intracardiac fistula, whereas CT is more useful for detecting perivalvular abscess and coronary artery disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006986DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracardiac complications
12
cardiac computed
8
computed tomography
8
transesophageal echocardiography
8
vegetation intracardiac
8
complications patients
8
patients infective
8
infective endocarditis
8
3-dimensional reconstruction
8
vegetation
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!