Comparison of two sedation regimens during targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest.

Resuscitation

Université Paris-Descartes-Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, UFR de Médecine, Paris, France; Medical ICU, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Paris Sudden-Death-Expertise-Center, Paris, France; Paris-Cardiovascular-Research-Center, INSERM U970, Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: July 2018

Purpose: Although guidelines on post-resuscitation care recommend the use of short-acting agents for sedation during targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest (CA), the potential advantages of this strategy have not been clinically demonstrated.

Methods: We compared two sedation regimens (propofol-remifentanil, period P2, vs midazolam-fentanyl, period P1) among comatose TTM-treated CA survivors. Management protocol, apart from sedation and neuromuscular blockers use, did not change between the two periods. Baseline severity was assessed with Cardiac-Arrest-Hospital-Prognosis (CAHP) score. Time to awakening was measured starting from discontinuation of sedation at the end of rewarming. Awakening was defined as delayed when it occurred after more than 48 h.

Results: 460 patients (134 in P2, 326 in P1) were included. CAHP score did not significantly differ between P2 and P1 (P = 0.93). Sixty percent of patients awoke in both periods (81/134 vs. 194/326, P = 0.85). Median time to awakening was 2.5 (IQR 1-9) hours in P2 vs. 17 (IQR 7-60) hours in P1. Awakening was delayed in 6% of patients in P2 vs. 29% in P1 (p < 0.001). After adjustment, P2 was associated with significantly lower odds of delayed awakening (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.2; P < 0.001). Patients in P2 had significantly more ventilator-free days (25 vs. 24 days; P = 0.007), and lower catecholamine-free days within day 28. Survival and favorable neurologic outcome at discharge did not differ across periods.

Conclusions: During TTM following resuscitation from CA, sedation with propofol-remifentanil was associated with significantly earlier awakening and more ventilator-free days as compared with midazolam-fentanyl.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sedation regimens
8
targeted temperature
8
temperature management
8
cardiac arrest
8
cahp score
8
time awakening
8
comparison sedation
4
regimens targeted
4
management cardiac
4
arrest purpose
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this sedation regimen, where non-anesthesiologists performed sedation.

Methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors, sedated by non-anesthesiologists, were retrospectively evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

NH600001 is a new general anaesthetic drug with a structure similar to etomidate. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between concentrations of NH600001 and sedation efficacy based on data from phase I-II studies and factors influencing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NH600001. The dataset consisted of 2 phase I studies in healthy subjects and 1 phase II study in patients undergoing gastroscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Balanced Propofol Sedation for Bronchoscopy.

Ther Clin Risk Manag

December 2024

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Purpose: We conducted a prospective, real-world study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of balanced propofol sedation (BPS) in bronchoscopy and identify an advantageous sedation regimen for such procedures.

Patients And Methods: The participants were placed in four groups based on their sedation regimen (exposure factor): the M-S group (midazolam + sufentanil for traditional sedation), R-S group (remimazolam + sufentanil for traditional sedation), M-S-P group (midazolam + sufentanil + propofol for BPS), and R-S-P group (remimazolam + sufentanil + propofol for BPS). The primary outcomes included satisfaction metrics (satisfaction of the patients, endoscopic physicians, and nurses) and follow-up questionnaires.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intranasal administration is a convenient route for drug delivery that can be applied for procedural sedation. However, there is currently limited exploration into fixed dosing regimens. This study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), bioavailability (BA) and safety of dexmedetomidine after fixed doses of intranasal and intravenous administration in healthy male and female subjects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pharmacogenomic variation and sedation outcomes during early intensive care unit admission: A pragmatic study.

Clin Transl Sci

December 2024

Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Unpredictable reactions to sedatives and analgesics in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation may stem from genetic differences.
  • The study aimed to explore the relationship between pharmacogenomic variations and sedation outcomes, while also assessing ICU patients' views on pharmacogenomic testing.
  • The researchers found that while participants showed a median of 2 altered pharmacogenomic phenotypes, there were no significant links between these genetic variations and sedation effectiveness; however, ICU patients generally had positive attitudes towards pharmacogenomic testing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!