Background: Misinterpretation of medical images is an important source of diagnostic error. Errors can occur in different phases of the diagnostic process. Insight in the error types made by learners is crucial for training and giving effective feedback. Most diagnostic skill tests however penalize diagnostic mistakes without an eye for the diagnostic process and the type of error. A radiology test with stepwise reasoning questions was used to distinguish error types in the visual diagnostic process. We evaluated the additional value of a stepwise question-format, in comparison with only diagnostic questions in radiology tests.
Methods: Medical students in a radiology elective (n=109) took a radiology test including 11-13 cases in stepwise question-format: marking an abnormality, describing the abnormality and giving a diagnosis. Errors were coded by two independent researchers as perception, analysis, diagnosis, or undefined. Erroneous cases were further evaluated for the presence of latent errors or partial knowledge. Inter-rater reliabilities and percentages of cases with latent errors and partial knowledge were calculated.
Results: The stepwise question-format procedure applied to 1351 cases completed by 109 medical students revealed 828 errors. Mean inter-rater reliability of error type coding was Cohen's κ=0.79. Six hundred and fifty errors (79%) could be coded as perception, analysis or diagnosis errors. The stepwise question-format revealed latent errors in 9% and partial knowledge in 18% of cases.
Conclusions: A stepwise question-format can reliably distinguish error types in the visual diagnostic process, and reveals latent errors and partial knowledge.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dx-2016-0033 | DOI Listing |
Diagnosis (Berl)
June 2017
Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background: Misinterpretation of medical images is an important source of diagnostic error. Errors can occur in different phases of the diagnostic process. Insight in the error types made by learners is crucial for training and giving effective feedback.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFZhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi
August 2011
College of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510305, China; Shenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Objective: To estimate the intangible cost and associated factors on patients with hepatitis B-related diseases, so as to explore the differences of the three elicitation techniques on the 'willingness to pay approach' (WTP).
Methods: Face-to-Face interviews were conducted to collect health economics-related information by trained investigators, using a structured questionnaire. WTP was employed to estimate the intangible cost while an open-ended question format, together with iterative bidding game and payment card were respectively used to elicit WTP for the hypothetical cure of hepatitis B-related diseases.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!