A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Calcaneal Osteotomy Safe Zone to Prevent Neurological Damage: Fact or Fiction? | LitMetric

Background: Calcaneal osteotomy is a commonly used surgical option for the correction of hindfoot malalignment. A previous cadaveric study described a neurological "safe zone" for calcaneal osteotomy. We performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate the presence of neurological injuries following calcaneal osteotomies and the location of the osteotomy in relation to the reported safe zone.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed charts of patients who underwent calcaneal osteotomy at our institution from 2011 to 2015. All immediate postoperative radiographs were examined and the shortest distance between the calcaneal osteotomy line and a reference line connecting the posterior superior apex of the calcaneal tuberosity to the origin of the plantar fascia was measured. If the osteotomy line was positioned within an area 11.2 mm anterior to the reference line, it was considered to be inside the neurological safe zone. We correlated the positioning of the osteotomy with the presence of postoperative neurological complications.

Results: We identified 179 calcaneal osteotomy cases. Of the 174 (97.2%) nerve injury-free cases, 62.6% (109/174) were performed inside the defined "safe zone" while 37.4% (65/174) outside. A total of 5 (2.8%) nerve complications were identified: 3 (60%) were inside the safe zone and 2 (40%) outside the safe zone. Osteotomies outside the safe zone had a 1.114 relative risk of nerve injury with a 95% CI of 0.191 to 6.500 and showed no statistically significant difference ( P = .9042).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the clinical "safe zone" in calcaneal osteotomies may not actually exist, likely because of wide anatomical variation of the implicated nerves, as described in prior studies. Patients should be properly counseled preoperatively on the low, but seemingly fixed, risk of nerve injury before undergoing calcaneal osteotomy.

Levels Of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1938640018762556DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

calcaneal osteotomy
24
safe zone
20
"safe zone"
12
calcaneal
10
osteotomy
8
zone" calcaneal
8
calcaneal osteotomies
8
risk nerve
8
nerve injury
8
safe
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!