Administration of temozolomide: Comparison of conventional and metronomic chemotherapy regimens.

J Theor Biol

Emlyon Business School, Écully F-69130, France; ETH Zurich, Zurich CH-8092, Switzerland. Electronic address:

Published: June 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Metronomic Chemotherapy (MC) protocols for temozolomide, aiming to identify optimal chemotherapy regimens.
  • A pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics model is used to evaluate drug efficacy and toxicity, including myelosuppression caused by temozolomide.
  • Findings indicate that the MC regimen can lower toxicity without losing efficacy, while the MTD protocol faces trade-offs between improved efficacy and increased toxicity, paving the way for customized treatment plans.

Article Abstract

Purpose: We compare the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Metronomic Chemotherapy (MC) protocols for temozolomide administration. We develop an innovative methodology for characterizing optimal chemotherapy regimens.

Methods: We use a PK/PD model based on Faivre et al. (2013) for the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide, as well as the pharmacodynamics of its efficacy. For toxicity, which is measured by the nadir of the normalized absolute neutrophil count, we formalize the myelosuppression effect of temozolomide with the physiological model of Panetta et al. (2003b). We introduce a multi-criteria tool for comparing protocols along their efficacy and toxicity dimensions.

Results: We show that the toxicity of the MC regimen proposed by Faivre et al. (2013) can greatly be reduced without affecting its efficacy, while the standard MTD protocol efficacy cannot be improved without impairing its toxicity. We also show that for any acceptable toxicity level, the optimal protocol remains closely related to standard MTD.

Conclusions: Overall, our new method enables a rich comparison between protocols along multiple dimensions. We can rank protocols for temozolomide administration. It is a first step toward building optimal individual protocols.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.02.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metronomic chemotherapy
8
protocols temozolomide
8
temozolomide administration
8
faivre et al
8
et al 2013
8
efficacy toxicity
8
protocols
5
toxicity
5
administration temozolomide
4
temozolomide comparison
4

Similar Publications

Background: GALOP investigators developed a prospective cooperative protocol for localized Ewing sarcoma (ES) incorporating interval-compressed chemotherapy (VDC/IE, vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide and etoposide). After completing conventional treatment, patients were randomized to 1 year of metronomic chemotherapy (vinblastine and cyclophosphamide).

Methods: Phase III randomized prospective trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are a rare and heterogeneous subset of skin-localized, non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Our aim was to evaluate the in vitro antitumor activity of the multi-kinase inhibitor linifanib, either alone or in combination with metronomic vinorelbine (mVNR) or etoposide (mETO), on CTCL cells. In vitro proliferation assay and Luminex analysis showed that long-term, daily exposure of linifanib significantly inhibited the proliferation of the human CTCL cell line HH, in a concentration-dependent manner (IC = 48.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The MOVIE phase I/II trial (NCT03518606) evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of durvalumab and tremelimumab combined with metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with advanced tumors. We present the results of the recurrent advanced cervical cancer cohort.

Methods: Patients received tremelimumab (intravenously, 75 mg, every four weeks (Q4W); four cycles max) plus durvalumab (intravenously, 1,500 mg, Q4W; 26 cycles max) and metronomic oral vinorelbine (40 mg, every three weeks (3QW)) until disease progression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The treatment for patients with high-grade gliomas includes surgical resection of tumor, radiotherapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy. However, some patients do not respond to temozolomide due to a methylation reversal mechanism by the enzyme O-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT). In patients receiving treatment with temozolomide, this biomarker has been used as a prognostic factor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!