Purpose: Technology holds great potential to support Deaf individuals as they age into older adulthood. However, it is unclear to what extent Deaf seniors are using technology in everyday life or whether they experience challenges in using technology. The current study explored technology use among older Deaf adults with regard to attitudes, adoption style, and frequency of use for a wide range of technologies, including assistive technologies (ATs) for persons with hearing loss and general, everyday technologies.
Materials And Methods: We developed a questionnaire that assessed older Deaf adults' use of and experiences with technology. The questionnaire was made available in online and paper versions. Participants (N = 109) were recruited from national conferences and organizations for the Deaf.
Results: Overall, we found that the older Deaf adults were technology adopters and regularly use and feel comfortable with a variety of devices. However, we also identified a number of technologies that are not being used by this population, including an AT that appears to have become obsolete and technologies that use sound-based alerts.
Conclusions: Insights on how older Deaf adults are embracing technology and which devices they are actually using can help policy makers, technology developers, and a range of aging services professionals, better meet the needs of this understudied population. Implications for Rehabilitation: Older Deaf adults use a variety of assistive and everyday technologies and must be considered as consumers and included in the design process. Older Deaf adults are generally positive in their attitudes towards technologies but they are infrequent users of potentially beneficial health technologies, highlighting opportunities for future research and development. Assistive technology for the Deaf (TTY/TTD) appears to have become obsolete with advances in modern communication technologies, which has implications for policy decisions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1447609 | DOI Listing |
J Speech Lang Hear Res
December 2024
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Purpose: This report compares device use in a cohort of Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children who are deaf and hard of hearing, including children fitted with traditional hearing aids, cochlear implants (CIs), and/or bone-conduction hearing devices.
Method: Participants were 84 Spanish-English bilingual children and 85 English monolingual children from clinical sites across the United States. The data represent a subset obtained in a larger clinical trial.
Trends Hear
December 2024
Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
This study investigated the effects of noise and hearing impairment on conversational dynamics between pairs of young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired interlocutors. Twelve pairs of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals completed a spot-the-difference task in quiet and in three levels of multitalker babble. To achieve the rapid response timing of turn taking that has been observed in normal conversations, people must simultaneously comprehend incoming speech, plan a response, and predict when their partners will end their turn.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Res Protoc
December 2024
Institute of Epidemiology & Health, University Collegue London, London, United Kingdom.
Background: The current standard of interpretation provision is not efficacious or not acceptable to Deaf patients who communicate using sign language. In-person or video relay interpretation (VRI) sign language interpretation is largely unavailable. There are no clear data on the availability of VRI or in-person interpretation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAging Ment Health
November 2024
Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Objectives: Deaf people face complex challenges in accessing healthcare, particularly for age-related conditions, yet the Deaf community is largely overlooked in dementia research. This study explores healthcare issues in relation to dementia for older Deaf individuals, and perspectives of stakeholders regarding dementia and the Deaf community.
Method: Combined approach of (1) narrative literature review using five online databases and grey literature and (2) semi-structured interviews with eight participants with lived experience or knowledge of the Deaf community and/or dementia.
BMJ Med
November 2024
Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!