The aim of this study was to assess whether there are differences between the results of determining oxidative stress markers obtained from different origin cell lines after exposure to chemicals generating free radicals. The studies considered two markers of oxidative stress: the level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and superoxide dismutase activity. The evaluation was performed in five cell lines: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-9) cells, lung adenocarcinoma A549, macrophages RAW264.7, skin carcinoma cells A431, and keratinocytes HaCaT. Three compounds generating free radicals were used as a source of reactive oxygen/nitrogen: 2,2'-azobis-2-methyl-propanimidamide dihydrochloride (AAPH), sodium persulfate (SP), and 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (SIN-1). The most appropriate cell line to assess the level of TBARS proved to be the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. Equally, good performance was observed in the lung cancer cell line A549, but only when tested with AAPH and SP. In the case of measuring superoxide dismutase activity, it appeared that the most suitable cell line was also the RAW 264.7 line, although dispersion increased significantly at the highest concentrations of AAPH and SP measurements. When choosing a cell line to determine oxidative stress, the specificity of the stress-inducing compound and the parameter determined should be taken into consideration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0748233717752090DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oxidative stress
16
cell lines
8
generating free
8
free radicals
8
superoxide dismutase
8
dismutase activity
8
cell raw
8
raw 2647
8
cell
7
comparative study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!