Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): Further Testing and Instrument Revision.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Dr. Orchard: Professor, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Pederson: Adjunct Professor, Epidemiology, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing. Dr. Read: Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. Dr. Mahler: Senior Researcher, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Published: May 2019

Introduction: The need to be able to assess collaborative practice in health care teams has been recognized in response to the direction for team-based care in a number of policy documents. The purpose of this study is to report on further refinement of such a measurement instrument, the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS) first published in 2012. To support this refinement, two objectives were set: Objective 1: to determine whether the items from the data collected in 2016 load on the same factors as found for the 2012 version of the 37-item AITCS. Objective 2: to determine whether the items in the subscales of the AITCS could be reduced while retaining psychometric properties similar to those from the earlier versions of the AITCS.

Methods: Initially, the overall data sets of 1002 respondents from two hospitals and four community agencies were analyzed for demographics and scale and subscale mean values, SDs, and mean item scores. After deletion of respondents because of missing data, 967 respondents were available for the first analysis. An exploratory factor analysis was then conducted to determine the factor structure. All respondents with any random missing data were further removed to reduce the data set to 676 responses, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis to find a model fit resulting in an item reduction in the scale.

Results: The result was a 23-item AITCS-II for practitioners that retained acceptable levels of reliability and validity within 3 subscales-partnership (8 items), cooperation (8 items), and coordination (7 items).

Discussion: The shortened version of the AITCS-II is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to assess collaboration in health care teams in practice settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000193DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assessment interprofessional
8
interprofessional team
8
team collaboration
8
collaboration scale
8
scale aitcs
8
health care
8
care teams
8
objective determine
8
determine items
8
missing data
8

Similar Publications

Background Daily interdisciplinary rounds in hospitals are becoming standardized to maximize the multidisciplinary approach to hospitalized patient care. We hypothesize that structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds (IDRs) increase the satisfaction, education, and experience of medical staff and thus detail actionable recommendations for IDR implementation or delineate measurable long-term impacts. Methods This observational study was performed in a 300-bed community hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implementing IPE in a Workplace Setting: Educational Design Research Promotes Transformative Participation.

Perspect Med Educ

January 2025

Wenckebach Institute, Lifelong Learning, Education and Assessment Research Network (LEARN), University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Background: Educators struggle to implement Interprofessional Education (IPE) in workplace settings. We adopted an educational design research (EDR) approach to implement an IPE activity and establish design principles supporting IPE implementation in workplace settings.

Method: We adopted an iterative process of analysis/exploration, design/construction and evaluation/reflection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intro: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a critical tool in the care of severe cardiorespiratory dysfunction. Simulation training for ECMO has become standard practice. Therefore, Keck Medicine of the University of California (USC) holds simulation-training sessions to reinforce and improve providers knowledge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging treatment option for small, low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety profiles of RFA for primary T1a vs. T1b PTC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: Malnutrition and sarcopenia are interrelated health concerns among the elderly. Each condition is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, rehospitalization rates, longer hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Their combination leads to the development of "Malnutrition-Sarcopenia Syndrome" (MSS), characterized by reductions in body weight, muscle mass, strength, and physical function.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!