Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Patients' adherence to elastic compression stockings is difficult to evaluate, and therefore we create a short self-questionnaire and validate its psychometric properties.
Methods: We reduce the questions with Varimed rotation analysis, evaluate its internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha test and its external validity by comparison to electronic thermic captors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine a threshold and determine its sensitivity and specificity.
Results: The initial questionnaire was reduced from 22 to 5 questions rated from 0 to 4. The internal consistency and its external validity are good, and the ROC analysis shows that values > 3 correspond to poor compliance with a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 63.1%.
Conclusion: The adherence score is valid for the detection of patients poorly compliant to the wearing of elastic compression. Its small number of questions makes it a suitable for a screening in everyday practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355518762824 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!