Objectives: The aim of this article is to study patient satisfaction with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in an in-hospital setting before and after the introduction of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

Methods: Patients were interviewed regarding a general evaluation of their hospital stay, the psychological talking therapy, the nutrition therapy, and the overall success of the treatment.

Results: The medical treatment was evaluated by 1158 patients. A very good success was reported by 347, a good by 609, a moderate by 181, and none by 21 patients. DRG implementation showed no significant effects. Psychological talking therapy was evaluated as "very good" ( ≤ .05). With regard to the success of the medical talking and nutrition therapy, there were no significant differences ( ≥ .05) between the time before and after DRG implementation.

Conclusion: Broadening conventional medical treatment with CAM practices can lead to a parallel treatment of DRGs in hospitals working with complementary medicine. This results in very patient-centered therapies, which may impact patient satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5833206PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2164956118759256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient satisfaction
12
diagnosis-related groups
8
psychological talking
8
talking therapy
8
nutrition therapy
8
medical treatment
8
levels patient
4
satisfaction integrative
4
integrative medicine
4
medicine implementation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!