Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Existing measures of generalized joint hypermobility do not include commonly affected upper limb joints.
Objective: To evaluate the reliability of a novel clinically-applicable measure of upper limb joint mobility, its ability to discriminate between varying extents of hypermobility, identify generalized joint hypermobility, and to establish a cut-point for hypermobility classification.
Design: Validation of a diagnostic tool.
Method: Participants were sought from three groups - healthy controls, likely and known hypermobiles, and assessed using the Upper Limb Hypermobility Assessment Tool (ULHAT), Beighton score and clinical opinion. Pearson's correlation coefficient examined individual group and whole cohort relationships between upper limb hypermobility, age, gender and ethnicity. MANOVA investigated between-group differences in ULHAT scores. Median interquartile ranges and ROC Curve analysis identified the cut-off score for identification of upper limb hypermobility. Percent agreement with clinical opinion assessed the ability of the ULHAT to identify generalized joint hypermobility.
Results: 112 adult participants (mean age 24.3 ± 5.5years) across the three groups were assessed. Inter-rater reliability of the tool was high (ICC2,1 = 0.92). The cut-point was established at ≥7/12 (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.77, +LR 3.7, -LR 0.2). Upper limb hypermobility did not vary with age or ethnicity (both p > 0.12), but was greater in females (p < 0.001). The ULHAT discriminated between the three groups and identified generalized hypermobility.
Conclusions: The 12-item ULHAT measures mobility of multiple upper limb joints in all movement planes. Using a cut-off of ≥7/12 in adults, the ULHAT is a reliable and valid tool for identifying upper limb hypermobility and generalized joint hypermobility.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.02.006 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!