A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Classification of Acute Rejection Episodes in Kidney Transplantation: a Proposal Based on Factor Analysis. | LitMetric

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is considered the ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease. Acute rejection can influence graft survival. The aim of this study was to propose a classification system for acute rejection based on factor analysis.

Materials And Methods: Data were collected from kidney transplant recipients with acute rejection diagnosis based on standard histological variables, the presence of peritubular eosinophils, and immunolabeling for lysozyme and myeloperoxidase in kidney tissue. Factor analysis was employed for data reduction and generation of a new case classification, with orthogonal rotation as a strategy to simplify factors, and principal component analysis was used as an extraction method.

Results: Seventy-nine kidney biopsies were obtained from 74 patients. The total population was divided into humoral rejection (39.2%), cellular rejection (34.1%), and mixed acute rejection (26.7%). No significant differences were found between the three groups in clinical and biochemical variables. We extracted 4 factors using factor analysis. The 1st factor was characterized by the presence of capillaritis, plasma cells infiltration, tubulitis, and inflammation. The 2nd factor included positivity for lysozyme and myeloperoxidase, while the 3rd factor included the presence of eosinophils and glomerulitis. The 4th component consisted of the presence of C4d and endarteritis. The cases belonging to the 3rd factor showed the greatest increase in serum creatinine. The cases belonging to the 4th factor exhibited greater urinary excretion of proteins.

Conclusions: This proposal of classification of acute rejection could contribute to evaluate the prognosis of kidney transplant recipients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute rejection
24
factor analysis
12
factor
9
classification acute
8
rejection
8
kidney transplantation
8
based factor
8
kidney transplant
8
transplant recipients
8
lysozyme myeloperoxidase
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!