A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Inter- and intra-mouse variability in odor preferences revealed in an olfactory multiple-choice test. | LitMetric

Animals choose between sensory stimuli, a highly complex behavior which includes detection, discrimination, preference, and memory processes. Rodents are reported to display robust preferences for some odors, for instance, in the context of choosing among possible mates or food items. In contrast to the apparent robustness of responses toward these and other "ethologically relevant" odors, little is known about the robustness of behaviors toward odors which have no overt role in the rodent ecological niche, so-called "nonethologically relevant" odors. We developed an apparatus for monitoring the nose-poking behavior of mice and used this apparatus to explore the prevalence and stability of choices among different odors both across mice, and within mice over successive days. Mice were tested with a panel of either ethologically relevant or nonethologically relevant odors in an olfactory multiple-choice test. Significant preferences to nonethologically relevant odors were observed across the population of mice, with longer investigation durations to some odors more than to others. However, we found substantial inter-mouse variability in these responses, and that responses to these odors even varied within mice across days of testing. Tests with ethologically relevant odors revealed that responses toward these odors were also variable across mice, but within individual mice, responses were somewhat stable. This work establishes an olfactory multiple-choice test for monitoring odor investigation, choice, and preference behaviors and the application of this apparatus to assess across- and within-mouse odor-preference choice stability. These results highlight that odor preferences, as assayed by measuring choice behaviors, are variable. (PsycINFO Database Record

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530477PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bne0000233DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

olfactory multiple-choice
12
multiple-choice test
12
relevant odors
12
odors
11
odor preferences
8
relevant" odors
8
mice
8
ethologically relevant
8
nonethologically relevant
8
responses odors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!