AAPM Report 142 recommends and the State of Ohio requires that the imaging dose be quantified in radiotherapy applications. Using the TG51 dose calibration protocol for MV Imaging dose measurement requires knowledge of the k parameter for the beam quality and the ionization chamber type under investigation. The %dd(10) of the Varian TrueBeam 2.5 MV imaging beam falls outside the range of the available data for the calculation of the k value. Due to the similarities of the 2.5 MV imaging beam and the Co beam, we and others made the assumption that k = 1.0 in TG51 calculations. In this study, we used the TG21 and TG51 calibration protocols in conjunction to validate that k = 1.0 for the 2.5 MV imaging beam using a PTW 30013 farmer chamber. Standard measurements for TG51 absolute dosimetry QA were performed at 100 cm SSD, 10 cm depth, 10 × 10 field size, delivering 100 Monitor Units to a waterproof Farmer Chamber (PTW TN30013) for both 2.5 and 6 MV. Both the TG21 and TG51 formalisms were used to calculate the dose to water per MU at d (D /MU) for the 6 MV beam. The calculated outputs were 1.0005 and 1.0004 cGy/MU respectively. The TG21 formalism was then used to calculate (D /MU) for the 2.5 MV imaging beam. This value was then used in the TG51 formalism to find k for the 2.5 MV imaging beam. A k value of 1.00 ± 0.01 was calculated for 2.5 MV using this method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5978706 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12290 | DOI Listing |
Clin Transl Oncol
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
Introduction: SRS for the treatment of limited brain metastases (BM) is widely accepted, but there are still limitations in the management of numerous BM. Frameless single-isocenter multitarget SRS is a novel technique that allows for rapid treatment delivery to multiple BM. We report our preliminary clinical, dosimetric, and patient´s shifts outcomes with this technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The degenerative joint disease is a temporomandibular disorder. By analysing texture parameters, it becomes possible to characterize and differentiate various tissues, based on their textural properties according to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). This study evaluated degenerative diseases in the temporomandibular joint through texture analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBraz Oral Res
January 2025
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas, School of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
The aim of this cross-sectional study was to perform a three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the cranial base of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 52 UCLP patients (21 females and 31 males; mean age, 10.0 ± 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Adv
January 2025
Department of Biophysics, Institute of Quantum Biophysics, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
Optical resolution photoacoustic imaging of uneven samples without z-scanning is transformative for the fast analysis and diagnosis of diseases. However, current approaches to elongate the depth of field (DOF) typically imply cumbersome postprocessing procedures, bulky optical element ensembles, or substantial excitation beam side lobes. Metasurface technology allows for the phase modulation of light and the miniaturization of imaging systems to wavelength-size thickness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Part Ther
March 2025
Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Purpose: The spot size of scanned particle beams is of crucial importance for the correct dose delivery and, therefore, plays a significant role in the quality assurance (QA) of pencil beam scanning ion beam therapy.
Materials And Methods: This study compares 5 detector types-radiochromic film, ionization chamber (IC) array, flat panel detector, multiwire chamber, and IC-for measuring the spot size of proton and carbon ion beams.
Results: Variations of up to 30% were found between detectors, underscoring the impact of detector choice on QA outcomes.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!