AI Article Synopsis

  • Impulse oscillometry is a technique used to assess lung mechanics, differing in mouthpiece design impacts results and user comfort.
  • A study compared three mouthpieces—circular (B1), oval (B2), and a circular with free-flow (B3)—using healthy volunteers to evaluate respiratory measurements and comfort preferences.
  • Results showed significant differences in lung resistance, reactance, and resonant frequencies between mouthpieces, with B1 being most preferred by 10 subjects and B2 by 15, indicating variation in user experience and airway assessment outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Impulse oscillometry is a method of airway assessment and diagnosis that provides data on lung mechanics. In the literature, studies have used different types of mouthpieces or did not describe the model used for the tests. We sought to compare the 3 most commonly described mouthpieces in terms of test results, comfort, and subject preference.

Methods: Thirty-nine healthy volunteers were evaluated with spirometry and impulse oscillometry, assessing the resistance at 5 Hz and 20 Hz (R5 and R20, respectively), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), reactance area, and resonant frequency. A filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1), a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2), and a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) were compared using an acceptability and tolerance scale, and subjects noted their preference.

Results: Statistical analysis showed differences between all the mouthpieces and the predicted values for R5, R20, and X5. The mouthpiece comparison showed differences in R5 between a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) ( = .007); resonant frequency between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2) ( = .004) and between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) ( = .003); and reactance area between a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1) and a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) ( = .01). In the subjective evaluation, acceptability and tolerance differences were found in the ease of carrying out the evaluation, and no difference was found with regard to the degree of discomfort. Ten subjects preferred a filter heat exchanger with a circular mouthpiece (B1), 15 preferred a filter heat exchanger with an oval mouthpiece (B2), and 14 preferred a circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3).

Conclusions: A circular mouthpiece coupled with a free-flow piece (B3) appeared to be the most suitable mouthpiece for the impulse oscillometry tests. It assured smaller impedance values for the respiratory system, and subjects expressed the most confidence in using this mouthpiece.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05471DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

circular mouthpiece
44
filter heat
40
heat exchanger
40
exchanger circular
24
mouthpiece coupled
24
coupled free-flow
24
free-flow piece
24
mouthpiece
18
impulse oscillometry
16
exchanger oval
16

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Impulse oscillometry is a technique used to assess lung mechanics, differing in mouthpiece design impacts results and user comfort.
  • A study compared three mouthpieces—circular (B1), oval (B2), and a circular with free-flow (B3)—using healthy volunteers to evaluate respiratory measurements and comfort preferences.
  • Results showed significant differences in lung resistance, reactance, and resonant frequencies between mouthpieces, with B1 being most preferred by 10 subjects and B2 by 15, indicating variation in user experience and airway assessment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Protocol for Bioinspired Design: A Ground Sampler Based on Sea Urchin Jaws.

J Vis Exp

April 2016

Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, San Diego; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego;

Bioinspired design is an emerging field that takes inspiration from nature to develop high-performance materials and devices. The sea urchin mouthpiece, known as the Aristotle's lantern, is a compelling source of bioinspiration with an intricate network of musculature and calcareous teeth that can scrape, cut, chew food and bore holes into rocky substrates. We describe the bioinspiration process as including animal observation, specimen characterization, device fabrication and mechanism bioexploration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Presented in this work are the results of a study designed to investigate the impact of the valve metering chamber volume and actuator design on the aerodynamic particle size distribution (PSD) of a suspension metered dose inhaler (MDI) containing propellant HFA-227. It was hypothesized that the valve metering volume and the actuator design in the MDI could influence the PSD of the emitted dose since it would affect the aerosol spray dynamics. The PSD results from this study, measured using cascade impaction, revealed that samples containing an actuator intended for oral delivery (rectangular mouthpiece and orifice diameter of approximately 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characterization of aerosols of human recombinant deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) generated by jet nebulizers.

Pharm Res

April 1994

Pharmaceutical Research and Development Department, Genetech, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080.

Recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) is a new therapeutic agent developed to improve clearance of purulent sputum from the human airways. It is delivered by inhalation. Four jet nebulizers, T Up-Draft II (Hudson), Customized Respirgard II (Marquest), Acorn II (Marquest), and Airlife Misty (Baxter), were evaluated in vitro for their ability to deliver aerosols of rhDNase.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Maximal static expiratory pressure developed at the mouth (PEmax) provides a useful clinical index of expiratory muscle function; however, the range of normal values among laboratories shows considerable variation. We examined the hypothesis that the wide variability could be attributable to the differences in technique among laboratories. We measured PEmax at functional residual capacity (PEmax FRC) in 28 healthy subjects using the following five techniques: 1) using a scuba-type mouthpiece with the cheeks supported by the hands ("hands on"), 2) without supporting the cheeks ("no hands"), 3) using a rigid, circular mouthpiece (2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!