A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral skull base lesions. | LitMetric

Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral skull base lesions.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg

University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:

Published: April 2018

Objective: With the use of multiple endoscopic endonasal surgical corridors, extended endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEEAs) are now being used to treat a wide range of ventral skull base lesions. Our aim was to present our experience with EEEAs to the ventral skull base lesions.

Patients And Methods: The study group consisted of 106 patients (57 men and 49 women) who underwent surgery for skull base lesions using EEEAs from 2010 to 2017. The EEEA was most commonly used for giant pituitary macroadenomas, sinonasal malignancies, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, and fibro-osseous lesions. Four different approaches were used including transtuberculum-transplanum, transethmoidal-transcribriform, transclival, and transmaxillary-transpterygoidal.

Results: The overall gross total resection (GTR) rate for these diverse pathologies was 75.0% in 88 patients (excluding the operations performed for non-neoplastic pathologies). GTR was achieved in 100%, 77.8%, 75%, 75%, 72.2%, 62.5%, 60% of fibro-osseous lesions, giant/large pitutary adenomas, meningiomas, esthesioneuroblastomas, sinonasal malignancies, craniopharyngiomas, and chordomas, respectively. The overall rate of improvement in visual fields was 86%. The overall rate of CSF leak was 8.4%. Other surgical complications included intracerebral hematoma and tension pneumocephalus. The mortality rate was 0.9%.

Conclusion: EEEA is a safe, well-tolerated and effective surgical treatment modality in the management of ventral skull base lesions. It should be performed with close interdisciplinary collaboration. Appropriate case selection is mandatory. However, despite improved reconstruction techniques, postoperative CSF leakage still remains a challenge.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skull base
20
ventral skull
16
base lesions
16
endoscopic endonasal
12
extended endoscopic
8
sinonasal malignancies
8
fibro-osseous lesions
8
lesions
6
skull
5
base
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!