Validation of imaging-based quantification of glenohumeral joint kinematics using an unmodified clinical biplane fluoroscopy system.

J Biomech

Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address:

Published: April 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Model-based tracking utilizing CT and biplane fluoroscopy offers precise measurement of shoulder (glenohumeral) movement, along with changes in the space under the acromion.
  • The study aimed to validate the use of a standard clinical biplane fluoroscope for these measurements instead of specialized, FDA-approved systems that are rare and costly.
  • Results showed that this standard system achieved high accuracy in tracking shoulder motion with minimal error margins, demonstrating its potential for clinical applications without the need for custom equipment.

Article Abstract

Model-based tracking, using CT and biplane fluoroscopy, allows highly accurate quantification of glenohumeral motion and changes in the subacromial space. Previous investigators have used custom-built biplane fluoroscopes designed specifically for kinematic applications, which are available at few institutions and require FDA approval prior to clinical use. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of an off-the-shelf clinical biplane fluoroscope for kinematic applications by validating model-based tracking for measurement of glenohumeral motion using an unmodified clinical system. Biplane images of each shoulder of a cadaver torso were acquired at various joint positions and during simulated movements along anatomical planes of motion. The pose of each humerus and scapula was determined using model-based tracking and compared to a bead-based gold standard. Error due to a temporal-offset between corresponding biplane images, characteristic of clinical biplane systems, was determined by comparison of measured and known relative position of 2 bead clusters of a phantom that was imaged while moved throughout the fluoroscopy image volume. Model-based tracking had global kinematic mean absolute errors of 0.27 mm and 0.29° (static), and 0.22-0.32 mm and 0.12-0.45° (dynamic). Glenohumeral mean absolute errors were 0.39 mm and 0.45° (static), and 0.36-0.42 mm and 0.41-0.48° (dynamic). The temporal-offset was predicted to add errors of 0.06-0.85 mm and 0.05-0.28° for cadaveric trials for the speeds examined. For defined speeds, sub-millimeter and sub-degree kinematic accuracy and precision were achieved using an unmodified clinical biplane fluoroscope for quantification of glenohumeral motion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878125PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.02.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical biplane
16
model-based tracking
16
quantification glenohumeral
12
unmodified clinical
12
glenohumeral motion
12
biplane
8
biplane fluoroscopy
8
kinematic applications
8
biplane fluoroscope
8
biplane images
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!