Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a skin disease with itchy hives and/or angio-oedema that last for at least 6 weeks without an obvious external trigger.
Objectives: To determine the cost-effectiveness of omalizumab relative to standard of care (SoC; up to four times the daily dose of H -antihistamines) in the Netherlands from a societal perspective.
Methods: The Markov model used consisted of five health states based on Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days. Model settings and characteristics of the Dutch patient population were based on an online survey among clinical experts and were validated during an expert committee meeting. Transition probabilities were derived from the GLACIAL trial. Healthcare consumption, quality of life (using EuroQol-5D) and productivity losses were derived from a burden-of-illness study (ASSURE-CSU) among 93 Dutch patients. Healthcare consumption and productivity losses were evaluated using the Dutch costing manual. The comparator treatment was SoC, consisting of (updosed) antihistamines. A 10-year time horizon was used.
Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of omalizumab vs. SoC was €17 502 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Productivity costs played an important role in the value of the ICER; discarding productivity costs resulted in an ICER of €85 310 per QALY.
Conclusions: Omalizumab is cost-effective compared with SoC. The outcomes of this study were used to establish omalizumab as third-line therapy in the Dutch treatment guidelines for CSU.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16476 | DOI Listing |
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep
November 2024
Amsterdam UMC, Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, D2-233, Postbus 22660, Amsterdam Zuidoost , 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Purpose Of Review: Olfactory dysfunction significantly impacts quality of life that affects a majority of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The aim of this review is to explore the impact of various treatment regimens on olfactory dysfunction in patients diagnosed with CRSwNP.
Recent Findings: Accurate assessment of olfactory dysfunction remains challenging and should incorporate both psychophysical tests and patient-reported outcomes.
An Bras Dermatol
January 2025
Department of Immunology and Allergy, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
JAMA Dermatol
November 2024
Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Cureus
July 2024
Otolaryngology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, JPN.
Traditional treatments for cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis include second-generation antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Omalizumab (Xolair®), an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibody, is an additional option for severe cases unresponsive to existing therapies. Numerous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic effectiveness of omalizumab for cedar seasonal allergic rhinitis; however, most reported results after only up to four weeks of follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImmunol Allergy Clin North Am
August 2024
Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12700 East 19th Avenue 10C03, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!