A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Serum S100 Proteins as a Marker of Disease Activity in Large Vessel Vasculitis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of serum S100A8/S100A9 and S100A12 levels as markers of disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) compared to traditional markers like ESR and CRP.
  • There were significant increases in S100 protein levels during active GCA, indicating they might be reliable indicators of disease status.
  • In contrast, no significant differences were found in serum markers for Takayasu's arteritis between active and inactive states, suggesting a unique behavior of S100 proteins specific to GCA.

Article Abstract

Background/objectives: Serum S100A8/S100A9 and S100A12 levels have been shown to be elevated in giant cell arteritis (GCA). This study aimed to determine if levels of serum S100 proteins perform as markers in a comparable fashion to standard markers of disease activity in large-vessel vasculitis.

Methods: Serum samples were obtained from the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC) Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of GCA and Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). A mixed effects model compared S100 proteins during active and inactive disease states. Receiver operating characteristic curves compared models using S100 proteins to models using ESR and CRP.

Results: There were 106 samples (50 during active disease) from patients with GCA and 32 samples (16 during active disease) from patients with TAK. In GCA, S100A8/S100A9 and S100A12 were significantly elevated during active disease (1445.6 ng/mL vs. 1095.7 ng/mL, p = 0.003;163.2 ng/mL vs. 116.6ng/mL, p=0.016, respectively). There were weak correlations between levels of S100 proteins and ESR or CRP. A model including S100A8/S100A9, S100A12, ESR, and CRP was a better indicator of disease activity compared to ESR and CRP together. In TAK, there were no significant differences between active and inactive disease for either the S100 proteins or ESR/CRP.

Conclusions: Serum levels of S100A8/S100A9 and S100A12 are elevated during active disease and perform comparably to ESR and CRP as measures of disease activity in giant cell arteritis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105726PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000729DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

s100 proteins
24
disease activity
16
s100a8/s100a9 s100a12
16
active disease
16
esr crp
16
disease
10
serum s100
8
giant cell
8
cell arteritis
8
active inactive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!