A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[The Update of the Rehabilitation Therapy Standards of the German Pension Assurance]. | LitMetric

[The Update of the Rehabilitation Therapy Standards of the German Pension Assurance].

Rehabilitation (Stuttg)

Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Bereich Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin.

Published: February 2018

Objectives: To report on the process of updating the German Pension Insurers' rehabilitation therapy standards (RTS) from 2013 to 2015.

Methods: Four methodical approaches were taken to gather evidence: a) systematic literature searches, b) the formation of expert groups, expert workshops, and online discussion forums to bring together the experiences from clinicians and patients, c) an analysis of the latest KTL data to understand the extent to which the RTS are currently being fulfilled, and d) conceptual consideration of the significance of current developments in rehabilitation in light of the RTS revision.

Results: There are now updated versions of all 9 RTS. Over half of the therapy modules are based on scientific evidence. Other modules are based on clinical experience with good clinical-practice standards. The scientific evidence has not changed much overall in the last few years, although there are some indications of higher evidence levels.

Conclusion: The revised RTS can make a positive contribution to ensuring that rehabilitation is of high quality. Further research is needed to increase the level of evidence - especially regarding the intensity of therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124309DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rehabilitation therapy
8
therapy standards
8
german pension
8
modules based
8
scientific evidence
8
rts
5
evidence
5
[the update
4
rehabilitation
4
update rehabilitation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!