AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess if haloperidol, given preventively, could enhance survival rates in critically ill adults prone to delirium, involving 1,789 participants across 21 ICUs in the Netherlands.
  • The research found no significant difference in survival rates between the haloperidol (both 1 mg and 2 mg) and placebo groups after 28 days, leading to the early termination of the 1-mg haloperidol group due to lack of effectiveness.
  • Additionally, 15 secondary outcomes related to delirium and ICU stay showed no noteworthy differences, indicating that prophylactic haloperidol might not be beneficial for this patient population.

Article Abstract

Importance: Results of studies on use of prophylactic haloperidol in critically ill adults are inconclusive, especially in patients at high risk of delirium.

Objective: To determine whether prophylactic use of haloperidol improves survival among critically ill adults at high risk of delirium, which was defined as an anticipated intensive care unit (ICU) stay of at least 2 days.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigator-driven study involving 1789 critically ill adults treated at 21 ICUs, at which nonpharmacological interventions for delirium prevention are routinely used in the Netherlands. Patients without delirium whose expected ICU stay was at least a day were included. Recruitment was from July 2013 to December 2016 and follow-up was conducted at 90 days with the final follow-up on March 1, 2017.

Interventions: Patients received prophylactic treatment 3 times daily intravenously either 1 mg (n = 350) or 2 mg (n = 732) of haloperidol or placebo (n = 707), consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride.

Main Outcome And Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days that patients survived in 28 days. There were 15 secondary outcomes, including delirium incidence, 28-day delirium-free and coma-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU and hospital length of stay.

Results: All 1789 randomized patients (mean, age 66.6 years [SD, 12.6]; 1099 men [61.4%]) completed the study. The 1-mg haloperidol group was prematurely stopped because of futility. There was no difference in the median days patients survived in 28 days, 28 days in the 2-mg haloperidol group vs 28 days in the placebo group, for a difference of 0 days (95% CI, 0-0; P = .93) and a hazard ratio of 1.003 (95% CI, 0.78-1.30, P=.82). All of the 15 secondary outcomes were not statistically different. These included delirium incidence (mean difference, 1.5%, 95% CI, -3.6% to 6.7%), delirium-free and coma-free days (mean difference, 0 days, 95% CI, 0-0 days), and duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU, and hospital length of stay (mean difference, 0 days, 95% CI, 0-0 days for all 3 measures). The number of reported adverse effects did not differ between groups (2 [0.3%] for the 2-mg haloperidol group vs 1 [0.1%] for the placebo group).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among critically ill adults at high risk of delirium, the use of prophylactic haloperidol compared with placebo did not improve survival at 28 days. These findings do not support the use of prophylactic haloperidol for reducing mortality in critically ill adults.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01785290.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839284PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0160DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

critically ill
24
ill adults
20
high risk
16
prophylactic haloperidol
16
days
15
adults high
12
risk delirium
12
haloperidol group
12
difference days
12
days 95%
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!