A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of prostaglandin F2α as ovulatory stimulus for synchronizing dairy cattle. | LitMetric

Use of prostaglandin F2α as ovulatory stimulus for synchronizing dairy cattle.

Res Vet Sci

Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Porto Velho, Brazil. Electronic address:

Published: June 2018

The aim of this study was to evaluate if prostaglandin F2α (PGF) can be used to induce ovulation in a GnRH-progesterone based protocol. In Experiment 1 crossbred dairy cows (n=32) were synchronized with a progesterone-GnRH based protocol for seven days, where the luteolytic dose of 150μg PGF was given 24h prior progesterone device removal (CIDR). On Day 8 cows were separated into two groups to receive: 1) 2mL of Saline (Control Group, n=15) or 2) 150μg of PGF (PGF Group, n=17). Ovulation rate was higher in the PGF than Control group (100% vs 53.3%, P=0.001, Odds ratio=30.88). The percentage of cows that ovulated synchronously tended to be higher in the PGF than Control group (P=0.1, Odds ratio=9.6). Experiment 2 was performed in a cross-over (3×3) design. Crossbred dairy cows (n=25) received a CIDR for seven days and GnRH on Day 0. Seven days later 150μg of PGF was given and the progesterone device was removed, and 24h later cows were distributed into three groups to receive: 1) 2mL of Saline (Control Group, n=25), 2) 150μg of PGF (PGF Group, n=25) or 3) 1mg of ECP (ECP Group, n=23). Diameter of ovulatory follicle was larger in the PGF and Control than ECP Group (P=0.002, Effect size>4.0). Synchronized ovulation rate (between 72 and 96h after CIDR removal) tended to be higher in PGF group in Control group (P=0.1, Odds ratio=0.35). Results suggest that PGF is equally efficient to ECP to induce synchronized ovulation in dairy cows subjected to progesterone-GnRH based protocols.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.01.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
20
150μg pgf
16
pgf
12
dairy cows
12
pgf group
12
higher pgf
12
pgf control
12
group
10
prostaglandin f2α
8
based protocol
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!