Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to evaluate if prostaglandin F2α (PGF) can be used to induce ovulation in a GnRH-progesterone based protocol. In Experiment 1 crossbred dairy cows (n=32) were synchronized with a progesterone-GnRH based protocol for seven days, where the luteolytic dose of 150μg PGF was given 24h prior progesterone device removal (CIDR). On Day 8 cows were separated into two groups to receive: 1) 2mL of Saline (Control Group, n=15) or 2) 150μg of PGF (PGF Group, n=17). Ovulation rate was higher in the PGF than Control group (100% vs 53.3%, P=0.001, Odds ratio=30.88). The percentage of cows that ovulated synchronously tended to be higher in the PGF than Control group (P=0.1, Odds ratio=9.6). Experiment 2 was performed in a cross-over (3×3) design. Crossbred dairy cows (n=25) received a CIDR for seven days and GnRH on Day 0. Seven days later 150μg of PGF was given and the progesterone device was removed, and 24h later cows were distributed into three groups to receive: 1) 2mL of Saline (Control Group, n=25), 2) 150μg of PGF (PGF Group, n=25) or 3) 1mg of ECP (ECP Group, n=23). Diameter of ovulatory follicle was larger in the PGF and Control than ECP Group (P=0.002, Effect size>4.0). Synchronized ovulation rate (between 72 and 96h after CIDR removal) tended to be higher in PGF group in Control group (P=0.1, Odds ratio=0.35). Results suggest that PGF is equally efficient to ECP to induce synchronized ovulation in dairy cows subjected to progesterone-GnRH based protocols.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.01.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!