Objective/background: Deep venous stenting is increasingly used in the treatment of deep venous obstruction; however, there is currently no consensus regarding post-procedural antithrombotic therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the most commonly used antithrombotic regimens and facilitate global consensus.

Methods: An electronic survey containing three clinical scenarios on venous stenting for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions, acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and post-thrombotic syndrome was distributed to five societies whose members included vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, and haematologists. The results of the initial survey (phase 1) were used to produce seven consensus statements, which were distributed to the respondents for evaluation in the second round (phase 2), along with the results of phase 1. Consensus was defined a priori as endorsement or rejection of a statement by ≥ 67% of respondents.

Results: Phase 1 was completed by 106 experts, who practiced in 78 venous stenting centres in 28 countries. Sixty-one respondents (58% response rate) completed phase 2. Five of seven statements met the consensus criteria. Anticoagulation was the preferred treatment during the first 6-12 months following venous stenting for a compressive iliac vein lesion. Low molecular weight heparin was the antithrombotic agent of choice during the first 2-6 weeks. Lifelong anticoagulation was recommended after multiple DVTs. Discontinuation of anticoagulation after 6-12 months was advised following venous stenting for a single acute DVT. No agreement was reached regarding the role of long-term antiplatelet therapy.

Conclusions: Consensus existed amongst respondents regarding anticoagulant therapy following venous stenting. At present, there is no consensus regarding the role of antiplatelet agents in this context.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

venous stenting
28
antithrombotic therapy
8
venous
8
therapy venous
8
deep venous
8
iliac vein
8
6-12 months
8
stenting
7
consensus
7
phase
5

Similar Publications

Multi-disciplinary treatment of broncho-esophageal fistula in a high-risk single-lung patient.

J Cardiothorac Surg

January 2025

Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021, Bergen, Norway.

Background: A broncho-esophageal fistula (BEF) is a medical and surgical disaster. Treatment of BEF is often limited to palliative stent treatment that may migrate or cause erosions and tissue necrosis. Surgical repair of BEF is the only established definite treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Safety of accessing brachial veins for large-bore upper extremity venous thrombectomy using ClotTriever Thrombectomy System.

CVIR Endovasc

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Purpose: To evaluate access site adverse events following ClotTriever-mediated large-bore mechanical thrombectomy via small upper extremity deep veins (< 6-mm).

Materials And Methods: Twenty patients, including 24 upper extremity venous access sites, underwent ClotTriever-mediated large-bore thrombectomy of the upper extremity and thoracic central veins for symptomatic deep vein obstruction unresponsive to anticoagulation. Patients without follow-up venous duplex examinations (n = 3) were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The AVeNEW Post-Approval Study (AVeNEW PAS) follows upon results from the AVeNEW IDE clinical trial and was designed to provide additional clinical evidence of safety and effectiveness using the Covera™ Vascular Covered Stent to treat arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenoses in a real-world hemodialysis patient population.

Materials And Methods: One hundred AVF patients were prospectively enrolled at 11 clinical trial sites in the USA and treated with the covered stent after angioplasty of a clinically significant target stenosis. The primary safety outcome was freedom from any adverse event that suggests the involvement of the AV access circuit evaluated at 30 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ectopic varices can result from portal vein stenosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant portal vein resection reconstruction, and they can cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Although they can sometimes be fatal, various treatments have been reported. This report describes a case in which a percutaneous transhepatic approach was used to simultaneously perform variceal embolization and portal vein stenting in which a favorable outcome was achieved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!