AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed various depression rating scales to identify unique factors related to depressive symptoms, with a focus on patients undergoing treatment with the rapid-acting antidepressant ketamine.
  • Through exploratory factor analysis, eight key factors were identified: Depressed Mood, Tension, Negative Cognition, Impaired Sleep, Suicidal Thoughts, Reduced Appetite, Anhedonia, and Amotivation.
  • Limitations of the study include a small sample size, lack of an independent confirmation sample, and the specific treatment-resistant characteristics of the participants, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Article Abstract

Background: Due to the heterogeneity of depressive symptoms-which can include depressed mood, anhedonia, negative cognitive biases, and altered activity levels-researchers often use a combination of depression rating scales to assess symptoms. This study sought to identify unidimensional constructs measured across rating scales for depression and to evaluate these constructs across clinical trials of a rapid-acting antidepressant (ketamine).

Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on baseline ratings from the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Rating Scale (SHAPS). Inpatients with major depressive disorder (n = 76) or bipolar depression (n = 43) were participating in clinical ketamine trials. The trajectories of the resulting unidimensional scores were evaluated in 41 subjects with bipolar depression who participated in clinical ketamine trials.

Results: The best solution, which exhibited excellent fit to the data, comprised eight factors: Depressed Mood, Tension, Negative Cognition, Impaired Sleep, Suicidal Thoughts, Reduced Appetite, Anhedonia, and Amotivation. Various response patterns were observed across the clinical trial data, both in treatment effect (ketamine versus placebo) and in degree of placebo response, suggesting that use of these unidimensional constructs may reveal patterns not observed with traditional scoring of individual instruments.

Limitations: Limitations include: 1) small sample (and related inability to confirm measurement invariance); 2) absence of an independent sample for confirmation of factor structure; and 3) the treatment-resistant nature of the population, which may limit generalizability.

Conclusions: The empirical identification of unidimensional constructs creates more refined scores that may elucidate the connection between specific symptoms and underlying pathophysiology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5852677PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

depression rating
16
rating scales
12
unidimensional constructs
12
rating scale
12
depression
9
exploratory factor
8
factor analysis
8
depressed mood
8
bipolar depression
8
clinical ketamine
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!