Effect of position and positive pressure ventilation on functional residual capacity in morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial.

Can J Anaesth

Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, 2725, Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec City, QC, G1V 4G5, Canada.

Published: May 2018

Purpose: In morbidly obese patients, the position and ventilation strategy used during pre-oxygenation influence the safe non-hypoxic apnea time and the functional residual capacity (FRC). In awake morbidly obese volunteers, we hypothesized that the FRC would be higher after a five-minute period of positive pressure ventilation compared with spontaneous ventilation at zero inspiratory pressure.

Methods: Using a prospective crossover randomized trial design, obese subjects underwent, in a randomized order, a combination of one of three positions, supine (S), beach chair (BC), and reverse Trendelenburg (RT), and one of two ventilation strategies, spontaneous ventilation at zero inspiratory pressure (ZEEP-SV) or with positive pressure (PP-SV) set to an inspiratory pressure of 8 cmHO, positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmHO, and fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.21.

Results: Seventeen obese volunteers with a mean (standard deviation; SD) body mass index of 50 (8) kg·m were included. Mean (SD) FRC in the three positions (S, BC, RT) was significantly higher using PP-SV compared with ZEEP-SV [2571 (477) vs 2215 (481) mL, respectively; mean difference, 356; 95% confidence interval (CI), 209 to 502; P < 0.001]. Mean (SD) FRC was significantly higher in the RT compared with BC position [2483 (521) vs 2338 (469) mL, respectively; mean difference, 145; 95% CI, 31 to 404; P = 0.01], while there was no difference between S and BC [2359 (519) mL vs 2338 (469) mL, respectively; mean difference, 21; 95% CI, -93 to 135; P = 0.89].

Conclusion: In awake morbidly obese volunteers, an increase in the FRC is observed when spontaneous ventilation at zero inspiratory pressure is switched to positive pressure. Compared with S positioning, the BC position had no measurable impact on the FRC. The RT position resulted in an optimal FRC.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02121808). Registered 24 April 2014.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1050-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive pressure
16
morbidly obese
16
obese volunteers
12
spontaneous ventilation
12
ventilation inspiratory
12
inspiratory pressure
12
pressure
8
pressure ventilation
8
functional residual
8
residual capacity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!