Reading and visual word recognition ability in semantic dementia is not predicted by semantic performance.

Neuropsychologia

Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: March 2018

This paper describes longitudinal testing of two Semantic Dementia (SD) cases. It is common for patients with SD to present with deficits in reading aloud irregular words (i.e. surface dyslexia), and in lexical decision. Theorists from the connectionist tradition (e.g. Woollams et al., 2007) argue that in SD cases with concurrent surface dyslexia, the deterioration of irregular word reading and recognition performance is related to the extent of the deterioration of the semantic system. The Dual Route Cascaded model (DRC; Coltheart et al., 2001) makes no such prediction. We examined this issue using a battery of cognitive tests and two structural scans undertaken at different points in each cases time course. Across both cases, our behavioural testing found little evidence of a key putative link between semantic impairment and the decline of irregular word reading or lexical decision. In addition, our neuroimaging analyses suggested that it may be the emergence of atrophy to key neural regions both inside and outside the anterior temporal lobes that may best capture the emergence of impairments of irregular word reading, and implicated inferior temporal cortex in surface dyslexia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surface dyslexia
12
irregular word
12
word reading
12
semantic dementia
8
lexical decision
8
reading
5
semantic
5
reading visual
4
word
4
visual word
4

Similar Publications

Primary Progressive Aphasia in Italian and English: A Cross-Linguistic Cohort Study.

Neurology

December 2024

From the Dementia Research Centre (S.M., C.J.D.H., J.J., E.B., J.C.S.J., A.C., J.D.R., J.D.W.), Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom; Research and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM (S.M., C.M., V.M., S.P., S.S., V.B.), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (S.M.), Milan; IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (S.M.), San Donato Milanese, Italy; Division of Neurology (A.C.), Department of Internal Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society; Cognitive Clinical and Computational Neuroscience Research Unit (A.C.), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; University of Florence (G.G.), Italy; Department of Psychology & Language Sciences (A.V.), University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (A.I., S.B., B.N., S.S.), University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Careggi; and IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (B.N., S.S., V.B.), Florence, Italy.

Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates how language-specific features affect primary progressive aphasia (PPA) symptoms in Italian and English speakers, diverging from the traditionally English-focused research.
  • A comparison was made between 106 Italian speakers and 166 English speakers with various PPA syndromes, highlighting differences in demographic factors and symptom profiles.
  • Results showed significant variations between the cohorts, with English speakers having a higher proportion of nonfluent/agrammatic PPA cases and different patterns of language comprehension and production issues compared to Italian speakers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia are considered diagnostic features of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and are useful signs in English, a language whose attributes afford numerous opportunities to observe these phenomena. This, however, is not the case in many languages, including Italian, that have high transparency between orthography and phonology, making surface reading and spelling errors scarce. This creates a problem in applying the diagnostic recommendations for svPPA in such languages.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multiple Types of Developmental Dyslexias in a Shallow Orthography: Principles for Diagnostic Screening in Italian.

Brain Sci

July 2024

Language and Brain Lab, School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6997801, Israel.

A new dyslexia screening test for Italian, , is presented. The test was developed based on an integrated dual-route model of reading, which describes in detail specific mechanisms underpinning early visual processes as well as the lexical and the sublexical routes. The principle according to which the test was developed is that each dyslexia type is manifested in different kinds of errors and in different kinds of stimuli, and we therefore included stimuli sensitive to each dyslexia type in the test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Presentation features such as spelling, punctuation and handwriting can influence the evaluation of general text quality. High school students with dyslexia might therefore be at a disadvantage, as at least their spelling performance is typically poor(er). Furthermore, these students might show less sophisticated linguistic features of texts, such as word length and sentence complexity, that might also be related to text quality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

According to the primary systems hypothesis, reading requires interactions of visual-orthographic, phonological and semantic systems. Damage to each primary system generates very different types of acquired dyslexia. Variants of the connectionist 'triangle' models of reading have been developed to investigate individual acquired dyslexia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!