The influence of patient portals on users' decision making is insufficiently investigated: A systematic methodological review.

Int J Med Inform

Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK; Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Published: March 2018

Background: Patient portals are considered valuable conduits for supporting patients' self-management. However, it is unknown why they often fail to impact on health care processes and outcomes. This may be due to a scarcity of robust studies focusing on the steps that are required to induce improvement: users need to effectively interact with the portal (step 1) in order to receive information (step 2), which might influence their decision-making (step 3). We aimed to explore this potential knowledge gap by investigating to what extent each step has been investigated for patient portals, and explore the methodological approaches used.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature review using Coiera's information value chain as a guiding theoretical framework. We searched MEDLINE and Scopus by combining terms related to patient portals and evaluation methodologies. Two reviewers selected relevant papers through duplicate screening, and one extracted data from the included papers.

Results: We included 115 articles. The large majority (n = 104) evaluated aspects related to interaction with patient portals (step 1). Usage was most often assessed (n = 61), mainly by analysing system interaction data (n = 50), with most authors considering participants as active users if they logged in at least once. Overall usability (n = 57) was commonly assessed through non-validated questionnaires (n = 44). Step 2 (information received) was investigated in 58 studies, primarily by analysing interaction data to evaluate usage of specific system functionalities (n = 34). Eleven studies explicitly assessed the influence of patient portals on patients' and clinicians' decisions (step 3).

Conclusions: Whereas interaction with patient portals has been extensively studied, their influence on users' decision-making remains under-investigated. Methodological approaches to evaluating usage and usability of portals showed room for improvement. To unlock the potential of patient portals, more (robust) research should focus on better understanding the complex process of how portals lead to improved health and care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient portals
32
portals
10
influence patient
8
health care
8
methodological approaches
8
interaction patient
8
interaction data
8
patient
7
step
7
influence
4

Similar Publications

Long head of the biceps tendon pathology is a well-described proximal shoulder pain generator. While optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, popular operative management includes biceps tenodesis. However, appropriate restoration of the anatomic length-tension relationship of the biceps with tenodesis remains a challenge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Patient portals may facilitate breast cancer screening and could be an important factor to address inequities; however, this association is not well characterized. The authors sought to examine this association in a large academic health system to inform interventions to address breast cancer screening inequities.

Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study among Black patients in a large academic health system using logistic regression to examine the association between breast cancer screening and portal use, adjusting for multilevel covariates and interactions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) aims to improve patient access to care and communication with clinical providers. Overall, understanding the usability of RPM applications and their influence on clinical care workflows is limited from the perspectives of clinician end users at a cancer center in the Northeastern United States.

Objective: This study aims to explore the usability and functionality of RPM and elicit the perceptions and experiences of oncology clinicians using RPM for oncology patients after hospital discharge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Owing to the risk for septic arthritis, traumatic arthrotomies are an urgent surgical problem for the treating orthopaedic surgeon. Traditionally, diagnosis is with the saline load test (SLT), although in the awake patient is an invasive and potentially painful procedure. While computerized tomography (CT) has been shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for traumatic arthrotomies of other joints, its role has only recently been investigated in the setting of ankle arthrotomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Consumer Access and Utilization of Patient Portals for Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.

Comput Inform Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Medical Informatics and E-learning Unit, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University (Dr R.N. Aldekhyyel); College of Medicine, King Saud University (Mss Alshafi, Almohsen, Alhowaish, Alabbad, Alwahibi, and Alsuhaibani); and Department of English Literature, College of Languages, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (Dr R. Aldekhyyel), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; and School of Nursing, University of Minnesota (Dr Rajamani), Minneapolis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!