Background/objectives: This study investigated the craniofacial morphology of young individuals with congenital or childhood onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) compared to healthy subjects. The study also followed growth changes in their facial morphology over a 5-year period.
Materials/methods: Lateral cephalograms of the 26 subjects (young patients with DM1 from west and south Sweden) were taken at baseline and after a 5-year period. These radiographs were compared with normal standards based on healthy individuals from the Michigan Growth Study, according to their age and sex, using paired t-tests (P < 0.05).
Results: On examination of initial radiographic measurements, patients with DM1 showed, in the sagittal plane, larger ANB and smaller SNPg angles. Analysis of the vertical plane showed the mandibular plane angle (ML-NSL) and the intermaxillary angle (ML-NL) to be larger. During the 5-year follow-up period, the intermaxillary angle (ML-NL) remained the same in the group with DM1 whereas this angle decreased in healthy individuals.
Limitations: For ethical reasons, historical cephalometric norms were used to compare the growth and the craniofacial morphology of patients with DM1.
Conclusions/implications: Young patients with DM1 had already from the beginning a more retrognathic profile and hyperdivergent skeletal aberration with a steep mandibular plane and large intermaxillary angle when compared with healthy individuals. The intermaxillary angle did not decrease during the observation period, contrary to what was observed in healthy individuals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx104 | DOI Listing |
J Craniofac Surg
December 2024
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1 Kitasenzoku, Ota-ku, Tokyo.
The new orthognathic treatment strategy of non-segmental fixation (non-fix) sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with jaw exercise initiation on the second postoperative day, the so-called physiological positioning strategy (PPS), induces good skeletal stability with few temporomandibular joint (TMJ) symptoms after surgery in skeletal class III. This study aimed to clarify whether non-fix SSRO with modified PPS can be applied to skeletal class II. This retrospective study included skeletal class II patients who underwent non-fix SSRO to correct mandibular retrognathia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orofac Orthop
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Bişkek Cd. (8.Cd.) 1.Sk. No:8 06490 Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the use of class III elastics with fixed appliances and the Alt-RAMEC procedure on dentofacial structures in patients diagnosed with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Methods: The retrospective cohort study was performed on lateral cephalometric radiographs of 20 individuals (7 girls, 13 boys; mean chronological age 12.41 years) with skeletal class III malocclusion because of maxillary deficiency or maxillary deficiency and mandibular excess which were treated by using the Alt-RAMEC protocol and class III elastics.
Medicine (Baltimore)
December 2024
Faculty of Dentistry, PHENIKAA University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Rationale: Orthognathic surgery cases are inherently challenging to treat with lingual appliances due to the complexities of orthodontic management and difficulties in achieving intermaxillary fixation during surgery. This challenge is further amplified in cases involving asymmetric space closure, such as those with a missing molar on one side and a premolar on the other, a scenario not yet documented in the literature. This case report presents the orthodontic-orthognathic management of an adult patient requiring space closure of asymmetric missing lower teeth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCraniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr
September 2024
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos (UNIFESO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Original Article. The surgical treatment of mandibular fractures has undergone several changes over the past 100 years, since the use of wires and intermaxillary fixation, until today where most of the fractures are treated with internal fixation using plates and screws. For the correct use of this hardware, the surgeon must have adequate knowledge of jaw anatomy to prevent complications during the insertion of screws like in fractures of the mandibular body and angle, when the screws of the plate installed in the compression zone can damage the inferior alveolar nerve within the mandibular canal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnostics (Basel)
September 2024
School of Orthodontics, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Background: To achieve a successful result, the orthodontist must use a systematic approach to plan the orthodontic treatment. Defining the correct position of the upper and lower incisors and evaluating their relationship with intermaxillary discrepancy and facial divergence have been recognized as the starting point for the diagnostic decision regarding extractions and anchorage requirements. The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between intermaxillary discrepancy (ANPg^), mandibular inclination (SN^GoGn), lip incompetence, and the positioning of the upper and lower incisors (UIPs and LIPs) in a group of orthodontic patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!