This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of three measurement systems estimating gait speed during a loaded military march over graded terrain. Systems developed by the Swiss and Netherlands Armed Forces and a commercial wrist-based device were evaluated in comparison to a Global Positioning System. The first part of the paper focuses on the development of the Dutch system, where speed is estimated from a chest worn accelerometer and body measurements. For this validation study 36 subjects were walking or running 13 laps of 200 m at different speeds. Results showed that walking and running speed can be estimated with a R of 0.968 and 0.740, respectively. In the second part of this paper, data from 64 soldiers performing a 35 km march were used to evaluate the accuracy of three measurement systems in estimating speed. Data showed that estimating gait speed with a single accelerometer can be accurate for military activity, even without prior individual calibration measurements. However, predictions should be corrected for confounders such as body size and shoe type to be accurate. Both, downhill and uphill walking led to changes in gait characteristics and to an overestimation of speed by up to 10%. Correcting for slope or gradient using altimetry in future algorithms/experiments could improve the estimation of gait speed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gait speed
16
measurement systems
12
systems estimating
12
estimating gait
12
speed
8
speed loaded
8
loaded military
8
military march
8
march graded
8
graded terrain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!