Accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS scores for mortality in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit with suspected infection.

J Crit Care

ICU, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, R. Prof. Antônio Prudente, 211 Liberdade, São Paulo, SP 01509-010, Brazil; Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (Incor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44 Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP 05403-900, Brazil.

Published: June 2018

Purpose: To compare the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in critically ill cancer patients with suspected infection.

Methods: Data for 450 cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in 2014 with a suspected infection were retrospectively analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values for SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS criteria for ICU and hospital mortalities were calculated. Mortalities according to Sepsis-2 stratification (e.g., sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock) and Sepsis-3 stratification (e.g., infection, sepsis, and septic shock) were also compared.

Results: SOFA outperformed SIRS in predicting mortalities for ICU [(AUC, 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 95%, 0.71-0.81) vs. (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.56-0.67), p < .01] and hospital [(AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74) vs. (AUC, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52-0.63), p < .01)] patients. Similarly, qSOFA outperformed SIRS for both settings [(AUC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65-0.76, p = .02) vs. (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.74; p < .01), respectively].

Conclusions: SOFA and qSOFA were more sensitive and accurate than SIRS in predicting ICU and hospital mortality for critically ill cancer patients with suspected infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.12.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sofa qsofa
12
cancer patients
12
qsofa sirs
8
patients admitted
8
admitted intensive
8
intensive care
8
care unit
8
suspected infection
8
sirs criteria
8
sepsis septic
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Real-time risk monitoring is essential in ICUs but often struggles with a lack of updates for clinical variables, prompting the development of a new framework that incorporates uncertainties into existing risk assessment systems like the SOFA score.
  • The study analyzed data from 5,351 patients in a Cardiothoracic ICU, utilizing machine learning models to enhance real-time SOFA scores and account for uncertainties, with validation showing improved predictive capabilities for mortality and readmission.
  • Results demonstrated that the new model outperformed traditional SOFA scores and quick SOFA in predicting outcomes, suggesting it could lead to more efficient testing and better patient care in clinical settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The clinical utility of shock index in hospitalised patients requiring activation of the rapid response team.

Aust Crit Care

December 2024

King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Intensive Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address:

Background: The systolic shock index (SSI) is used to direct management and predict outcomes, but its utility in patients requiring rapid response team (RRT) activation is unclear.

Objectives: We explored whether SSI can predict the outcomes of ward patients experiencing clinical deterioration and compared its performance with other parameters.

Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients in medical/surgical wards who required RRT activation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To describe mortality predictive factors in patients 80years or older with infection who were visited at the emergency department and were admitted to hospital.

Methods: Retrospective observational study. Patients ≥80years old who visited the emergency department (January 1st to December 31st, 2022), whose main diagnosis was infection and required admission, were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There are few data regarding clinical outcomes from COVD-19 from low-income countries (LICs) including Rwanda. Accordingly, we aimed to determine 1) outcomes of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in Rwanda, and 2) the ability of the Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) score to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick (qSOFA) scores. We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare (CHUB), Rwanda, April 2021-January 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and aim , or pneumococcus, is one of the most common pathogens responsible for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), which can progress to sepsis and lead to severe illness. Several clinical scoring systems are widely used to assess the severity of CAP and sepsis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical factors that predict mortality in pneumococcal CAP (pCAP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!