The impact of the difference in O-C2 angle in the development of dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion: a simulation study in normal volunteers combined with a case-control study.

Background Context: Dysphagia has been recognized as one of the most serious complications after occipitocervical fusion (OCF), and the difference between postoperative and preoperative O-C2 angle (dO-C2A) was proposed to be an indicator in predicting and preventing dysphagia. Therefore, to prevent postoperative dysphagia, previous studies recommend that surgeons should correct the O-C2 angle (O-C2A) during surgery if the occipitocervical alignment was in an excessively flexed position. However, until now, there was no explicit indicator of the condition in which surgeons should adjust the patient's O-C2A during surgery.

Purpose: One of the purposes of this study was to explore the threshold of dO-C2A between dysphagia and normal swallowing by a simulation study. The other aim was to evaluate the validity of the threshold of dO-C2A in predicting dysphagia after OCF via a case-control study.

Study Design: This is a simulation study combined with a retrospective case-control study.

Patient Sample: Thirty volunteers were enrolled in the simulation study. Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent OCF between September 2011 and September 2016 were included in the case-control study.

Outcome Measures: The outcome measures included O-C2A, C2-7 angle (C2-7A), atlantodental interval (ADI), the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS), the rate of change in dnPAS (%dnPAS), and the prevalence of postoperative dysphagia.

Materials And Methods: In the simulation study, each volunteer received two lateral x-rays of their cervical spine in neutral position and dysphagia position, respectively. We compared the radiographic parameters in neutral and dysphagia positions. The cumulative frequency diagram of dO-C2A in the dysphagia position was analyzed to identify the threshold of dO-C2A in the development of dysphagia. In the case-control study, these 34 patients were divided into two groups according to the threshold of dO-C2A identified in the simulation study. The impact of radiographic parameters on nPAS was analyzed. The prevalence of postoperative dysphagia between the two groups was compared to evaluate the validity of the threshold of dO-C2A in predicting dysphagia after OCF.

Results: In the simulation study, the mean O-C2A and nPAS in the dysphagia position were significantly smaller than in the neutral position (p<.05). There was no significant difference between the mean C2-7A in the neutral and dysphagia positions (p>.05). There was a significant positive correlation between dO-C2A and dnPAS (p<.05). A dO-C2A of -5° delineated the threshold between normal swallowing and dysphagia. In the case-control study, multiple regression analysis showed that dO-C2A was the only significant variable correlated with dnPAS (β=0.769, p<.001). Among the reviewed 34 patients, the incidence of dysphagia was 17.6% (6/34) at 2 weeks after surgery and decreased over time to 11.8% (4 of 34) at the last follow-up. There was also a significant positive correlation between the dO-C2A and dnPAS (p<.05). The prevalence of dysphagia after OCF in patients with dO-C2A<-5° was as high as 66.7% (6/9). However, there was no patient suffering from dysphagia in patients with dO-C2A≥-5°.

Conclusion: The present study showed that the dO-C2A should be a key factor in the development of postoperative dysphagia after OCF. A dO-C2A of -5° could be the threshold between dysphagia and normal swallowing. Furthermore, to avoid dysphagia, surgeons should correct the O-C2A just before the final occipitocervical fixation if the checked dO-C2A during surgery is less than -5°.