The Hand Surgeon Consultation Improves Patient Knowledge in a Hand Surgery Mission to Honduras.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess impact of the surgeon consultation and informed consent process on patient education in an international hand surgery mission compared with a US academic hand surgery practice. These two groups were selected to evaluate communication difficulties in a surgical mission setting compared with standard of care in a high-income country.

Methods: A multi-part survey was administered to patients presenting to a hand surgery mission during March 2012 and new patients of a university hand center in a 3-month period during 2011. Surveys were administered prior to and following surgeon consultation with one fellowship-trained hand surgeon. The survey assessed knowledge of basic hand anatomy, physiology, disease, individual diagnosis, and surgical risks.

Results: 71 patients participated in the study (university n=36, mission n=35). Pre-consultation quiz score averaged 58% in the university group versus 27% in the mission group. Post-consultation quiz scores averaged 62% in the university group versus 40% in the mission group. Only the mission group's quiz score increase was statistically significant. 93% of the university group reported learning about their condition and diagnosis, but only 40% demonstrated correct insight into their diagnosis. In the mission group, 73% reported learning about their condition and diagnosis while 53% demonstrated correct insight into their diagnosis. Although all consultations involved discussion of surgical risks, only 62% of the university group and 52% of the mission group recalled discussing surgical risks.

Conclusions: The hand surgeon consultation was more effective in improving hand knowledge in the surgery mission group compared to in a university hand practice. This suggests that the surgeon consultation should be pursued despite communication barriers in surgical missions. However, the discrepancy between patient perception of knowledge gains and correct insight into diagnosis, and the deficit of patient retention of surgical risks need to be improved.