Background: The SMART trial is a UK-based, multicentre RCT comparing prophylactic radiotherapy and symptom-based (deferred) radiotherapy in 203 patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma who had undergone large bore pleural interventions. Using costs and quality of life data collected alongside the clinical trial, we will estimate the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic radiotherapy compared to deferred radiotherapy over a 1-year period.
Methods: Healthcare utilization and costs were captured during the trial. Utility weights produced by the EQ-5D questionnaire were used to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated over the one-year trial period.
Results: Costs were similar in the immediate and deferred radiotherapy groups: £5480.40 (SD = £7040; n = 102) and £5461.40 (SD = £7770; n = 101) respectively. There was also no difference in QALY: 0.498 (95% CI: [0.45, 0.547]) in the prophylactic radiotherapy group versus 0.525 (95% CI: [0.471, 0.580]) in the deferred group. At a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000/QALY there was only a 24% chance that prophylactic radiotherapy was cost-effective compared to deferred radiotherapy.
Conclusions: There was no significant effect of prophylactic radiotherapy on quality of life in the intervention group, nor was there any discernable decrease in healthcare costs. There is little evidence to suggest that prophylactic radiotherapy is a cost-effective intervention in this population.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN72767336 with ISRCTN.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798762 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190257 | PLOS |
JBJS Case Connect
October 2024
Department of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Case: A 72-year-old woman with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the thigh received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She underwent wide resection and was scheduled for prophylactic fixation of the femur. However, prophylactic fixation was deferred secondary to COVID-19 pandemic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
January 2025
Clinical and Basic Research Team of TCM Prevention and Treatment of NSCLC, Department of Oncology, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Chinese Medicine Guangdong Laboratory, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, State Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Objectives: To conduct an umbrella review to extensively evaluate and summarise the evidence regarding the relationship between risk factors and the occurrence of brain metastasis in lung cancer.
Design: Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Data Sources: Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 10 November 2024.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 2025
University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 25Gy/5# prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation for regional control during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for high risk prostate cancer.
Methods: The multinational XXXX consortium database of patients treated with curative-intent prostate SBRT for high risk prostate cancer was queried for prophylactic radiotherapy 25Gy/5# to the pelvic lymph nodes. Details of Phoenix-defined biochemical failure, and location of recurrence (local, regional, or distant) were extracted.
Curr Oncol
November 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa 277-8577, Chiba, Japan.
Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) have been widely used to reduce skeletal-related events, including pathological fractures. Herein, we aimed to clarify the incidence of pathological fractures caused by high-risk femoral bone metastases after palliative radiotherapy (RT) in the BMA era and evaluate the necessity of prophylactic surgical stabilization. We assessed 90 patients with high-risk femoral bone metastases, indicated by Mirels' scores ≥ 8, without pathological fractures and surgical fixations, who received palliative RT at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cancer
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan No. 1, Beijing, Dongcheng District, 100730, China.
Little is known about the role of the protective effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients after radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to explore the prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on febrile neutropenia (FN) and myelosuppression in chemotherapy patients with gynecologic malignancies after pelvic radiotherapy. Patients voluntarily participated in a study group (long-acting G-CSF for all chemotherapy cycles) and a control group (short-acting G-CSF) after they were educated about G-CSF utilization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!