Fistulography of a Patent Hemodialysis Access: When Not to Treat and Implications for Establishing a Nontreatment Rate.

Purpose: To establish a rate of nonintervention in patients referred for hemodialysis access fistulography and to report clinical and fistulographic variables associated with nonintervention.

Materials And Methods: Encounters for fistulography were reviewed from 2001 to 2016 to determine annual rates of nontreatment over 15 years. Next, an access database was used to retrospectively identify patients undergoing fistulography from 2010 to 2016. Patients who underwent fistulography without intervention (angioplasty or stent placement) served as the nontreatment group (NTG; n = 76). Patients who underwent fistulography with intervention served as the control group (CG; n = 77). Patients with thrombosed accesses were excluded. Clinical indications for intervention and physical examination findings were correlated with fistulography. Need for subsequent percutaneous intervention was recorded.

Results: Annual nontreatment rates ranged from 3% to 14% (median, 10%). Preprocedure thrill was encountered in 45 patients in the NTG (59%) vs 6 in the CG (7.8%; P < .01). Aneurysm as indication for fistulography was more common in the NTG than the CG (19 [25%] vs 4 [5%]; P < .01). The NTG had a higher proportion of aneurysms noted on fistulography as well (38 [50%] vs 19 [25%]; P < .01). The CG had a higher proportion of patients needing subsequent percutaneous intervention vs the NTG (73 [96%] vs 38 [50%]; P < .001).

Conclusions: A suggested nonintervention rate for hemodialysis access fistulography is 10%. Patients in the NTG were more likely to have a thrill on physical examination or to present with aneurysms as the clinical indicator. NTG patients were less likely to require subsequent percutaneous intervention.