Purpose: To evaluate by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) the corneal incision architecture after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in pig eyes, using manual, automated injectors or preloaded delivery systems.

Methods: Twenty-four pig eyes underwent IOL implantation in the anterior chamber using three different injectors: manual (Monarch III) (n = 8), automated (AutoSert) (n = 8), or a preloaded system (UltraSert) (n = 8). Acrysof IQ IOLs, 21 Dioptres (D) (n = 12) and 27D (n = 12), were implanted through 2.2 mm clear corneal incisions. Incision width was measured using corneal calipers. The endothelial side of the incision was analyzed with ESEM.

Results: In each group, the final size of the corneal wound after IOL implantation, measured by calipers, was 2.3-2.4 mm. The incision architecture resulted more irregular in the Monarch group compared with the other injectors. In every group the 27D IOL-implanted specimens showed more alterations than in 21D IOL-implanted samples, and this was less evident in the UltraSert group. The Descemet tear length was higher in the Monarch group than AutoSert and UltraSert group.

Conclusions: The automated and preloaded delivery systems provided a good corneal incision architecture; after high-power IOL implantation the incisions were more regular and less damaged with the preloaded system than with the other devices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0825-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iol implantation
20
incision architecture
16
corneal incision
12
three injectors
8
environmental scanning
8
scanning electron
8
electron microscopy
8
pig eyes
8
preloaded delivery
8
preloaded system
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To identify the minimally required number of distances of visual acuity (VA) measurements for the reliable estimation of the visual acuity curve (VAC) and area of the curve (AoC) in presbyopia correction.

Patients And Methods: The study was divided into a validation and a clinical phase with a total recruitment of 120 participants (120 eyes) who underwent uncomplicated pseudophakic presbyopia surgery with bilateral premium intraocular lenses (IOL) implantation. This study was conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The research investigates the efficacy of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) treatment in facilitating the development of compact water droplets on the rear surface of synthetic lenses with capsule imperfections during the process of fluid-air exchange.

Method: This study examined four patients with intraocular lens (IOL) implants and posterior capsule defects who experienced the formation of dense water droplets on the posterior surface following fluid-air exchange. When this occurrence obstructs fundus visualization during surgery, it is recommended to suspend the surgical procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To observe and explore the correlation between visual outcomes and intraocular lens (IOL) stability after tri-focal IOL implantation in eyes with high myopia.

Methods: Patients with highly myopic cataract (axial length > 26 mm) were enrolled in this prospective study. Thirty-one eyes (31 patients) received implantation of a trifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate residual refractive errors after intraocular lens (IOL) extraction and the safety and effectiveness of refractive correction procedures.

Methods: The eligibility criteria for this systematic review were patients who had undergone cataract or clear lens extraction and had experienced residual refractive error. All study designs were considered for inclusion and non-English publications, non-peer reviewed articles, books, and systematic reviews were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.

Methods: The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (R).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!