AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on the features, treatment approaches, and outcomes of corneal injuries caused by bee stings, based on a case series of 11 patients.
  • Out of the 11 eyes studied, 54.5% achieved good vision outcomes with medical treatment alone, while 45.5% required surgical intervention due to poor outcomes.
  • The findings suggest that using oral corticosteroids in combination with topical treatments can help prevent serious complications in severe cases of corneal bee sting injuries.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the presenting features, management strategies, and clinical outcome following bee sting injury to the cornea.

Methods: Retrospective case series involving 11 eyes of 11 patients with corneal bee sting injuries who presented over a period of 2 years. Nine of these 11 eyes had the presence of intact bee stinger in the cornea, which was removed immediately under an operating microscope and sent for microbiological and histopathological evaluation. The patients were managed as per the individual treatment protocol of the respective treating physicians.

Results: Six eyes (54.5%) had a good clinical outcome (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] >20/40) with medical therapy alone with no need for surgical intervention. Five eyes (45.5%) had a poor clinical outcome (BCVA <20/40) with medical therapy and required surgery; of which three required a combined penetrating keratoplasty with cataract surgery, while one required isolated cataract surgery and one underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Glaucoma was present in 3/5 eyes undergoing surgery, one of which required a trabeculectomy. Five of the six eyes who had a good clinical outcome with medical therapy alone had been treated with concomitant oral steroids, along with topical antibiotic-steroid combination therapy.

Conclusion: Oral corticosteroid supplementation to the topical steroid antibiotic treatment in patients with corneal bee sting injury where corneal involvement and anterior reaction is severe at presentation or inflammation not ameliorating with topical steroids alone prevents serious vision-threatening complications such as corneal decompensation, cataract, and glaucoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819108PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_600_17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bee sting
12
clinical outcome
12
corneal bee
8
sting injury
8
management strategies
8
strategies clinical
8
ocular manifestations
4
manifestations isolated
4
isolated corneal
4
bee
4

Similar Publications

Background: Hymenoptera venom allergy is a potentially severe allergic reaction in the general population. The only preventative approach in these cases is venom immunotherapy (VIT), which follows different protocols. The recommended initial dose is 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

venom allergy (HVA) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction caused by species stings (honeybee, vespid, or ant). The only effective treatment is venom immunotherapy (VIT). Our study aimed to evaluate whether humoral and cellular biomarkers measured before, during, and after honeybee VIT are associated with the success of VIT, which was assessed by the response to a sting challenge one year after finishing VIT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Beekeeping plays crucial natural and economic roles but also poses health risks, as bee stings can cause severe allergic reactions like anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening condition that requires timely intervention. Understanding symptoms and the proper use of adrenaline autoinjectors is essential to minimize risks. This study aimed to assess the need for education on anaphylaxis and to develop a health education program to enhance beekeepers' preparedness and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To estimate the lifetime prevalence of first and recurrent systemic allergic reaction to bee venom among Slovenian beekeepers. Additionally, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors predisposing beekeepers to developing systemic allergic reaction to bee venom.

Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted among 1,080 beekeepers who are members of the Slovenian beekeeper's association, between 1 November 2021 and 31 May 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: A retrospective study will review episodes of anaphylaxis during bee venom immunotherapy (BVIT) in children, any modifications made to the dosing schedule, and the subsequent outcomes over a nine-year period in Western Australia.

Methods: Patient demographics, dose eliciting anaphylaxis during BVIT, modifications made to BVIT regimen following anaphylaxis (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!