Background: Clinician bias contributes to healthcare disparities, and the language used to describe a patient may reflect that bias. Although medical records are an integral method of communicating about patients, no studies have evaluated patient records as a means of transmitting bias from one clinician to another.
Objective: To assess whether stigmatizing language written in a patient medical record is associated with a subsequent physician-in-training's attitudes towards the patient and clinical decision-making.
Design: Randomized vignette study of two chart notes employing stigmatizing versus neutral language to describe the same hypothetical patient, a 28-year-old man with sickle cell disease.
Participants: A total of 413 physicians-in-training: medical students and residents in internal and emergency medicine programs at an urban academic medical center (54% response rate).
Main Measures: Attitudes towards the hypothetical patient using the previously validated Positive Attitudes towards Sickle Cell Patients Scale (range 7-35) and pain management decisions (residents only) using two multiple-choice questions (composite range 2-7 representing intensity of pain treatment).
Key Results: Exposure to the stigmatizing language note was associated with more negative attitudes towards the patient (20.6 stigmatizing vs. 25.6 neutral, p < 0.001). Furthermore, reading the stigmatizing language note was associated with less aggressive management of the patient's pain (5.56 stigmatizing vs. 6.22 neutral, p = 0.003).
Conclusions: Stigmatizing language used in medical records to describe patients can influence subsequent physicians-in-training in terms of their attitudes towards the patient and their medication prescribing behavior. This is an important and overlooked pathway by which bias can be propagated from one clinician to another. Attention to the language used in medical records may help to promote patient-centered care and to reduce healthcare disparities for stigmatized populations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5910343 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
"You're not taught to think about the words you use and then it just perpetuates"- a qualitative examination of medical students' perspectives of stigmatising language in healthcare.
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Background: Stigmatising language is used commonly in healthcare, affecting healthcare providers' perceptions of patients and care delivery. Using person-first language is best practice, however, it does not reflect reality.
Method: This study examined medical students' perspectives on stigmatising language in healthcare.
Gesture counteracts gender stereotypes conveyed through subtle linguistic cues.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Despite increased attempts to express equality in speech, biases often leak out through subtle linguistic cues. For example, the subject-complement statement (SCS, "Girls are as good as boys at math") is used to advocate for equality but often reinforces gender stereotypes (boys are the standard against which girls are judged). We ask whether stereotypes conveyed by SCS can be counteracted by gesture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGuidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Med Educ
January 2025
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Background: Patients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians' computerized notes in their medical records ("open notes"). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnderstanding broader community perspectives on the scientific accuracy and stigma of personality trait labels.
Personal Disord
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Many labels are used within and across subfields to describe personality disorder (PD) and interpersonally-oriented trait dimensions. For example, "interpersonal disorders" is a suggested alternative label to "personality disorders" in clinical research. Other "dark trait" terms, though not proposed as formal labels for PDs, also are used in different research areas for describing externalizing traits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerson-centred language for describing stratified approaches to TB treatment.
IJTLD Open
January 2025
UCSF Center for Tuberculosis, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!