Unlabelled: Prior real-world studies have shown that apixaban is associated with a reduced risk of stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE) and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, few studies evaluated the effectiveness and safety of apixaban according to its dosage, and most studies contained limited numbers of patients prescribed 2.5 mg twice-daily (BID) apixaban. Using pooled data from 4 American claims database sources, baseline characteristics and outcomes for patients prescribed 5 mg BID and 2.5 mg BID apixaban versus warfarin were compared. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, 31,827 5 mg BID apixaban-matched warfarin patients and 6600 2.5 mg BID apixaban-matched warfarin patients were identified. Patients prescribed 2.5 mg BID apixaban were older, had clinically more severe comorbidities, and were more likely to have a history of stroke and bleeding compared with 5 mg BID apixaban patients. Compared with warfarin, 5 mg BID apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.81) and major bleeding (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.66). Compared with warfarin, 2.5 mg BID apixaban was also associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.81) and major bleeding (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.71). In this real-world study, both apixaban doses were assessed in 2 patient groups differing in age and clinical characteristics. Each apixaban dose was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding compared with warfarin in the distinct population for which it is being prescribed in United States clinical practice.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier: NCT03087487.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786316PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0191722PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bid apixaban
24
major bleeding
16
versus warfarin
12
apixaban associated
12
patients prescribed
12
compared warfarin
12
associated lower
12
lower risk
12
risk stroke/se
12
apixaban
11

Similar Publications

Nowadays, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the gold standard for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and VTE secondary prophylaxis; nevertheless, the percentage of elderly patients in major trials and literature data about DOACs usage for VTE secondary prophylaxis in the elderly are scant. Our retrospective study tried to evaluate low-dose DOACs efficacy and safety for elderly VTE secondary prophylaxis in a real-life setting. A cohort of 73 patients (≥ 75 years) considered at high risk of VTE recurrence was treated with apixaban 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Apixaban trough concentrations in atrial fibrillation patients with reduced renal function.

Biomed Pharmacother

November 2024

Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet & Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address:

Introduction: The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban is partially eliminated by the kidneys but is still prescribed at fixed doses without therapeutic drug monitoring across varying levels of renal function. If apixaban accumulates due to renal impairment, this may translate into safety concerns, e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and represent the gold standard for VTE secondary prophylaxis, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit widespread DOACs usage there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety in major thrombophilia carriers and almost no data is available for low intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban as secondary VTE prophylaxis in such patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate and confront the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in major thrombophilia carriers vs patients at high risk of VTE recurrence for other reasons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The ideal long-term antithrombotic strategy for patients after successful catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is still uncertain. Presently, practices vary, and the advantages of oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the post-ablation population are not clearly established. To date, no randomized trials have addressed this therapeutic question.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • An air embolism, though rare, can lead to serious complications and must be identified early by critical care professionals to prevent morbidity and death, especially after procedures like contrast injections in CT scans.
  • A case of a 70-year-old man illustrates this condition, as he developed pulmonary artery air embolism following a contrast injection and required oxygen therapy, leading to improvements over time.
  • Post-recovery, the patient was discharged with prescriptions for antiviral and anticoagulant medications, highlighting the importance of monitoring and awareness of potential complications after radiological procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!