In 'Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing' Joona Räsänen argues that Christopher Kaczor's objections to Giubilini and Minerva's position on infanticide are not persuasive. We argue that Räsänen's criticism is largely misplaced, and that he has not engaged with Kaczor's strongest arguments against infanticide. We reply to each of Räsänen's criticisms, drawing on the full range of Kaczor's arguments, as well as adding some of our own.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12423 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
arguments infanticide
12
arguments
4
infanticide remain
4
remain convincing
4
convincing reply
4
reply räsänen
4
räsänen 'pro-life
4
'pro-life arguments
4
infanticide convincing'
4
convincing' joona
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!