Objective: Create a score to identify patients at risk of death or hospice placement who may benefit from goals of care discussion earlier in the hospitalisation.

Design: Retrospective cohort study to develop a risk index using multivariable logistic regression.

Setting: Two tertiary care hospitals in Southeastern Minnesota.

Participants: 92 879 adult general care admissions (50% male, average age 60 years).

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Our outcome measure was an aggregate of inhospital death or discharge to hospice. Predictor variables for the model encompassed comorbidities, nutrition status, functional status, demographics, fall risk, mental status, Charlson Comorbidity Index and acuity of illness on admission. Resuscitation status, race, geographic area of residence and marital status were added as covariates to account for confounding.

Results: Inhospital mortality and discharge to hospice were rare, with incidences of 1.2% and 0.8%, respectively. The Hospital End-of-Life Prognostic Score (HELPS) demonstrated good discrimination (C-statistic=0.866 in derivation set and 0.834 in validation set). The patients with the highest 5% of scores had an 8% risk of the outcome measure, relative risk 12.9 (10.9-15.4) when compared to the bottom 95%.

Conclusions: HELPS is able to identify patients with a high risk of inhospital death or need for hospice at discharge. These patients may benefit from early goals of care discussions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5780692PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015550DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inhospital death
12
death hospice
12
goals care
12
patients risk
8
risk inhospital
8
early goals
8
care discussions
8
identify patients
8
outcome measure
8
discharge hospice
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!