A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of Heated Humidified High Flow Air via Nasal Cannula on Respiratory Effort in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. | LitMetric

High flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC) has been widely adopted for respiratory distress, and evidence suggests that purging dead space of the upper airway improves gas fractions in the lung. This study tests the hypothesis that HFNC with room air could be as effective as low flow oxygen in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thirty-two COPD patients prescribed 1 - 2 L/min of oxygen were studied. The conditions tested consisted of a control (CTRL; no therapy), then in random order HFNC and prescribed low flow oxygen (LFO). HFNC was the highest flow tolerated up to 35 L/min without supplemental oxygen. Arterial blood gases (ABGs), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR) and tidal volume (V) were measured at the end of each condition. Arterial oxygen (PaO) was greater ( < 0.001) for LFO than both HFNC and CTRL (CTRL=57.4±6.1mmHg, HFNC=58.6±8.3mmHg, LFO=72.6±10.2mmHg). HFNC reduced RR by 11% (<0.05) from CTRL and LFO (CTRL=20.2±3.8br/min, HFNC=17.9±3.3br/min, LFO=20.2±3.7br/min) with no differences in V. There were no differences between arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO) (CTRL=45.5±4.9mmHg, HFNC=45.0±5.3mmHg, LFO=46.0±3.9mmHg). HFNC resulted in a clinically relevant reduction in ventilatory effort with no change in ABG indicating a gas equilibrium effect of purging anatomical dead space. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00990210.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5764841PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.4.4.2016.0169DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high flow
8
nasal cannula
8
chronic obstructive
8
obstructive pulmonary
8
pulmonary disease
8
low flow
8
flow oxygen
8
lfo hfnc
8
hfnc
6
flow
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!