Safety and Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Chemoembolization for Prostate Cancer-Initial Experience.

J Vasc Interv Radiol

Department of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Published: March 2018

Purpose: To evaluate outcome of prostatic artery chemoembolization for patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials And Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study was conducted between August 2013 and July 2016 in 20 patients with PCa who underwent chemoembolization. Mean patient age was 67.5 years ± 6.4. Gleason score was 6-10, and staging was T2N0M0. Fifteen patients refused prostatectomy and 5 wanted to stop hormonal therapy because of side effects. For chemoembolization, Chelidonium majus mother tincture 1 mL was slowly injected into the prostatic arteries. Docetaxel 1 mL and 150-300 μm Embosphere (Merit Medical Systems, Inc, South Jordan, Utah) microspheres 0.5 mL were thoroughly mixed, and the mixture was slowly injected by the same route. Embolization of prostatic arteries was finished with 150-300 μm Embosphere microspheres. Technical success was defined as bilateral prostatic artery embolization. Biochemical failure was defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) decrease to < 2 ng/mL followed by recurrence when PSA increased to > 2 ng/mL within 1 month after success.

Results: Technical success was 80.0% (16/20 patients). Biochemical failure was 18.7% (3/16 patients). There was 1 short-term biochemical recurrence at 4 months and 2 midterm recurrences (12-18 months). Biochemical success at 12-18 months was 62.5% (10/16 patients). Adverse events (31.3%) included a small area (2 cm) of bladder wall ischemia, which was removed by surgery (n = 1); transient acute urinary retention (n = 1) and urinary urgency (n = 1) for 1 week; sexual dysfunction (n = 2), which completely recovered after 10 and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusions: Prostatic artery chemoembolization allowed a biochemical response in patients with localized PCa and is a promising treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.10.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostatic artery
16
artery chemoembolization
12
slowly injected
8
prostatic arteries
8
150-300 μm
8
μm embosphere
8
technical success
8
biochemical failure
8
12-18 months
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

: This multicentric study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) to remove indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Secondary objectives were to identify features associated with post-PAE catheter-free survival (PCFS). : All consecutive patients who underwent PAE for IUC related to BPH with a follow-up of at least 2 years (except for early death) in 6 French University Hospitals were retrospectively included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of YouTube videos on patient education concerning prostatic artery embolization (PAE).

Methods: All PAE videos on YouTube were evaluated in December 2023. The quality of the videos was evaluated utilizing the DISCERN Scale Criterion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This is a single-centre prospective observational study examining radial access in 62 Prostatic Artery Embolisation (PAE) procedures. Evaluation of left radial artery diameter using high frequency ultrasound before and after administration of sublingual glycerl trinitrate (GTN). Pre-procedure questionnaires calculating symptom severity score compared with post-procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Early experience of prostate artery embolization: a retrospective single-centre study.

Scand J Urol

January 2025

Center for Clinical Research Västmanland, Uppsala University, Sweden; Division of Surgery, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early experiences of prostate artery embolization (PAE) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Material And Methods: This retrospective study included all patients treated for BPH who were referred to the radiology department for PAE in Västmanland between 2018 and 2021. Data were collected on patient demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen level, and peri- and post-procedure outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization Alone Versus Prostatic Artery Embolization Followed by HoLEP for Large (> 80 cm) Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Acad Radiol

December 2024

Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Gulou District, Nanjing 210029, China (Z.-W.X., C.-G.Z., W.T., H.-B.S., S.L.). Electronic address:

Rationale And Objectives: To compare the long-term efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with PAE followed by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with large prostatic volume (PV>80 cm), and to identify the appropriate population for PAE+HoLEP.

Methods: From March 2015 to December 2023, 208 consecutive BPH patients were enrolled into two groups: PAE monotherapy (Group A, n=168) and PAE followed by HoLEP (Group B, n=40). Differences in clinical and functional parameters between baseline and each follow-up point were compared.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!