Publication of your research represents the culmination of your scientific activities. The key to getting manuscripts accepted is to make them understandable and informative so that your colleagues will read and benefit from them. We describe key criteria for acceptance of manuscripts and outline a multi-step process for writing the manuscript. The likelihood that a manuscript will be accepted by a major journal is significantly increased if the manuscript is written in polished and fluent scientific English. Although scientific quality is the most important consideration, clear and concise writing often makes the difference between acceptance and rejection. As with any skill, efficient writing of high-quality manuscripts comes with experience and repetition. It is very uncommon for a manuscript to be accepted as submitted to a journal. Thoughtful and respectful responses to the journal reviewers' comments are critical. Success in scientific writing, as in surgery, is dependent on effort, repetition, and commitment. The transfer of knowledge through a well-written publication in a high-quality medical journal will have an impact not only in your own institution and country, but also throughout the world.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7703855PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6320-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-quality medical
8
medical journal
8
journal
5
steps manuscript
4
manuscript published
4
published high-quality
4
journal publication
4
publication represents
4
represents culmination
4
scientific
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: When implemented by national and regional regulatory agencies good review practices (GRevPs) support the timely high-quality review of medicines for enhanced patients' availability to safe, quality and efficacious innovative and generic products. It is important that all aspects of GRevPs are continuously evaluated and updated to promote the continuous improvement of regulatory systems at national and regional levels. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the GRevPs of the national medicines regulatory agencies (NMRAs) of Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo, who are active participants of the ECOWASMRH initiative to identify opportunities for improvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results: Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To systematically evaluate risk factors for stress-induced hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes after cardiac surgery.

Methods: Databases including CNKI, WanFang data, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using computer retrieval. The data were subjected to an in-depth meta-analysis using RevMan 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stroke remains a leading cause of death globally, with survivors facing both physical and psychological challenges. While acute stroke treatment has improved, many patients develop post-stroke anxiety (PSA), particularly generalized anxiety disorder. PSA represents a significant clinical challenge as most stroke survivors suffer from it.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oral health care in older people in long-term care facilities: An updated systematic review and meta-analyses of implementation strategies.

Int J Nurs Stud Adv

June 2025

Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing and FAITH Research, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Petrus Driessenstraat 3, 9714, CA, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Introduction: Oral health care of older people in long-term care facilities is insufficient, stressing the need for clear evidence-based implementation strategies to improve oral care. In 2013, a systematic review was performed and new evidence was published. This study aimed to gain insights into implementation strategies used to promote or improve oral health care for older people in long-term care facilities, explore their effectiveness and uncover strategy content in behavioral change techniques, and report the differences between the current results and those of the 2013 study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!