We examined how merely sharing attitudes with a good listener shapes speakers' attitudes. We predicted that high-quality (i.e., empathic, attentive, and nonjudgmental) listening reduces speakers' social anxiety and leads them to delve deeper into their attitude-relevant knowledge (greater self-awareness). This, subsequently, differentially affects two components of speaker's attitude certainty by increasing attitude clarity, but not attitude correctness. In addition, we predicted that this increased clarity is followed by increased attitude- expression intentions, but not attitude- persuasion intentions. We obtained consistent support for our hypotheses across five experiments (including one preregistered study), manipulating listening behavior in a variety of ways. This is the first evidence that an interpersonal variable, unrelated to the attitude itself, can affect attitude clarity and its consequences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167217747874DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

attitude clarity
12
attitude
6
listener sets
4
sets tone
4
tone high-quality
4
high-quality listening
4
listening increases
4
increases attitude
4
clarity
4
clarity behavior-intention
4

Similar Publications

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread adoption of virtual communication platforms. Virtual study visits were implemented in the pilot cluster randomized trial (CRT) stage of Teen Adherence in KidnEy transplant Improving Tracking To Optimize Outcomes (TAKE-IT TOO). The present study aimed to understand study coordinators' perspectives on conducting a behavioral intervention with adolescent kidney transplant recipients using virtual conferencing platforms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Palliative care improves the quality of life for seriously ill patients, but misconceptions and knowledge gaps hinder its implementation in home healthcare (HHC). This study developed and pilot-tested HHC-specific questionnaires to measure palliative care knowledge, attitudes, and confidence (PC-KAC) among clinicians, patients, and caregivers. Using literature reviews, expert input, and cognitive interviews, the questionnaires were refined to ensure clarity, practical relevance, and content validity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development and Content Validity of a Questionnaire on Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Maintenance and Knowledge of Nursing Professionals Regarding Best Practices.

J Infus Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPE-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (RN Doll); Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPE-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (RN Aprile); Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPE-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (RN Gonçalves); Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Bahia, Brazil (Prof da Silva); Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPE-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (Prof Kusahara); Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPE-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (Prof Lopes).

The aims of this study were to develop a questionnaire on peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) maintenance, evaluate its content validity, and assess factors influencing the level of knowledge of nursing professionals regarding best practices.The study was conducted in 3 stages: (1) development of a questionnaire on PIVC maintenance; (2) content validity assessment by experts with assessment of comprehensiveness, relevance, and clarity; and (3) application of the questionnaire to 1493 nursing professionals. Relationships between personal characteristics and knowledge levels were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a questionnaire on patient acceptance of orthodontic retainers. The original questionnaire was forward- and backward-translated, followed by four validity tests (content validity, face validity, construct validity, criterion validity) and two reliability tests (test-retest reliability, internal consistency). Content validity was assessed by nine orthodontists who appraised the questionnaire's representativeness, relevance, clarity, and necessity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education defines "nonphysician obligations" as "duties performed by nursing and allied health professionals, transport services, or clerical staff." How anesthesiology trainees understand the concept of "nonphysician obligations" and are impacted by these obligations is incompletely understood. The objective of the study was to identify how anesthesiology trainees define "nonphysician obligations," which obligations impact trainee education, and what attitudes trainees hold.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!