A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative enzymatic studies using ion-selective electrodes. The case of cholinesterases. | LitMetric

Comparative enzymatic studies using ion-selective electrodes. The case of cholinesterases.

Talanta

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia E-30100, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: April 2018

The application of traditional ion-selective electrodes for comparative enzymatic analysis was demonstrated for the first time in this study. A kinetic-potentiometric method based on the monitoring of the concentration of the ionic substrate involved in the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by different cholinesterases is used for this purpose. A comparative study was performed comprising both enzymatic assays using different ionic substrates and the corresponding inhibited reactions in presence of neostigmine (a synthetic anticholinesterase). The developed approach is used to obtain valuable comparative results through calculation of kinetic parameters, such as Michaelis and inhibition constants. Interesting results were obtained for acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase enzymes, which were selected as proof-of-concept: (i) the binding affinity that these enzymes have for their natural substrates showed to be higher (acetylcholine and butyrylcholine respectively) than for their corresponding thiol derivatives (acetylthiocholine and butyrylthiocholine), which are traditionally used in spectrophotometric enzymatic assays; (ii) as expected, the maximum hydrolysis rate found in the assays of each enzyme was independent of the substrate used; (iii) acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibition due to neostigmine was found to be higher (higher inhibition constant). Advantageously, the use of ion-selective electrodes permits to perform cholinesterases' enzymatic assays using their natural substrates and under physiological conditions, unlike the traditional spectrophotometric methods used in routine enzymatic assays. Importantly, while well-known enzymes are use throughout this work, this approach can be extended to other types of enzymatic assays as a tangible alternative to traditional spectrophotometric methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.12.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enzymatic assays
20
ion-selective electrodes
12
comparative enzymatic
8
natural substrates
8
traditional spectrophotometric
8
spectrophotometric methods
8
enzymatic
7
assays
6
comparative
4
enzymatic studies
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!