AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper discusses challenges in assessing the quality of synthesized 3-D views due to unique distortions that arise from view synthesis and depth map compression, which traditional quality metrics can't address since original reference views are often unavailable.
  • A new no-reference image quality assessment method called NIQSV+ is introduced, which evaluates synthesized views by identifying distortions like blurriness, black holes, and stretching without needing a reference image or depth map.
  • Experimental results indicate that NIQSV+ performs comparably to the best full-reference metrics and significantly outperforms other no-reference metrics, effectively aligning with human subjective quality assessments.

Article Abstract

Benefiting from multi-view video plus depth and depth-image-based-rendering technologies, only limited views of a real 3-D scene need to be captured, compressed, and transmitted. However, the quality assessment of synthesized views is very challenging, since some new types of distortions, which are inherently different from the texture coding errors, are inevitably produced by view synthesis and depth map compression, and the corresponding original views (reference views) are usually not available. Thus the full-reference quality metrics cannot be used for synthesized views. In this paper, we propose a novel no-reference image quality assessment method for 3-D synthesized views (called NIQSV+). This blind metric can evaluate the quality of synthesized views by measuring the typical synthesis distortions: blurry regions, black holes, and stretching, with access to neither the reference image nor the depth map. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we compare it with four full-reference 3-D (synthesized view dedicated) metrics, five full-reference 2-D metrics, and three no-reference 2-D metrics. In terms of their correlations with subjective scores, our experimental results show that the proposed no-reference metric approaches the best of the state-of-the-art full reference and no-reference 3-D metrics; and outperforms the widely used no-reference and full-reference 2-D metrics significantly. In terms of its approximation of human ranking, the proposed metric achieves the best performance in the experimental test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2017.2781420DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

synthesized views
16
quality assessment
12
2-d metrics
12
synthesized view
8
depth map
8
3-d synthesized
8
full-reference 2-d
8
metrics terms
8
views
7
synthesized
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!